Montague Parkette
Urban Plaza, middle of the pack overall (score 35, rank ~54th percentile). Strongest: enclosure; weakest: natural comfort.
Aerial, City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026
Montague Parkette scores 35.2 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: amenity diversity (0). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.
Area · 0.20 ha
Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 56%
Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.
Loading map…
The parks map is loading.Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).
Explain this score
Where did the 35 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.
Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.
Why this park works
Montague Parkette works because its enclosure score (82) is in the top tier and its edge activation (22) is also top quartile (39 mid-rise buildings frame the edge with passive surveillance).
What limits this park
Montague Parkette is held back by natural comfort (23, bottom quartile): only 0% canopy means little summer shade.
Most distinctive characteristic
Most distinctive feature: exceptionally low natural comfort (23, bottom quartile).
Jacobs reading
Montague Parkette sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.
Tradeoffs
- The park is enclosed by buildings (82) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 22): frame without animation.
- 22 nearby towers cast wind and shadow without contributing canopy: passive surveillance is plentiful but human-scale comfort is not.
Performance in context
- Citywide rank is high (54th) but typology rank is more modest (33rd): the strength likely comes from the dataset average pulling lower than this typology’s baseline.
Typology classification
Classified as Urban Plaza: 2007 m², paved (0% canopy), 30.7 buildings/100 m
Edge Activation
Within 100 m of the park edge: 5 active uses (retail, restaurant) and 3 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.
Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use
Connectivity
Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 1 mapped paths/walkways and 3 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 5 street intersections within 100 m; 20 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 1 estimated access points across ~241 m of perimeter. moderate edge density, small superblock penalty applied. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.
Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops
Amenity Diversity
No amenities recorded. Score is 0 until inventory is loaded.
Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags
Natural Comfort
Natural-comfort components for this park: 0.0% estimated tree canopy; nearest waterbody ~1262 m. Reading: exposed. Source coverage: waterbodies. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).
Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory
Enclosure / Eyes on Park
74 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (39 mid-rise, 13 low-rise, 22 tower); avg edge height 28.0 m (~9 floors); 30.7 buildings per 100 m of 241 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges lean tall but still framed; 22 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 39 mid-rise edge buildings.
Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)
Border Vacuum Risk
Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.
Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints
Equity Context
Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.
Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles
Amenities (0)
No amenities recorded for this park.
Nearby active-edge features (28)
- parking lot3 m
- parking lot54 m
- parking lot62 m
- retail67 m
- retail: Adina Photo67 m
- retail77 m
- retail: Little Bee Supermarket78 m
- restaurant: Kata Sushi83 m
- retail: Greendale Drugs103 m
- cafe: Jarvis house bed and breakfast121 m
- parking lot126 m
- transit stop: Jarvis Street127 m
- transit stop: Carlton Street129 m
- transit stop: Sherbourne Street138 m
- transit stop: Jarvis Street149 m
- transit stop155 m
- parking lot: Sherbourne158 m
- transit stop: Sherbourne Street160 m
- cafe: Tim Hortons163 m
- transit stop165 m
- transit stop: Carlton Street167 m
- parking lot172 m
- retail: The Shoe Room173 m
- restaurant: Madras Curry178 m
- retail: Vertie183 m
- retail: J & S Convenience194 m
- restaurant: Golden Diner Family Restaurant197 m
- restaurant: Chew Chew's Diner199 m
Park profile
Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.
Citywide percentile ranks
Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.
- Overall vitality54th
- Edge activation79th
- Connectivity54th
- Amenity diversity43th
- Natural comfort1th
- Enclosure88th
Most similar parks
Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.
- Blantyre ParkUrban Plaza35
- Bayview ParketteUrban Plaza34
- Regan ParkUrban Plaza39
- City Wide Open SpaceUrban Plaza35
- S.A.D.R.A. ParkCorridor / Linear Park39
Most opposite parks
Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.
- Trca Lands ( 26)Ravine / Naturalized Park27
- Kew GardensNeighbourhood Park75
- Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park28
- Toronto ZooWaterfront Park67
- Toronto Islands - Muggs Island ParkRavine / Naturalized Park25
Human activity signals: not available
No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.
Does this score feel accurate?
Your read of Montague Parkettematters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.
Tell us how this park feels
We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.
What would improve this park?
Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.
- Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
- Add or open more entrances and improve sidewalk continuity around the park. More permeability means more spontaneous use.
- Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
- Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.
Data sources
- City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
- Parks & Recreation FacilitiesInventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
- Toronto Pedestrian NetworkSidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
- Toronto Centreline V2Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
- Toronto 3D MassingBuilding footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
- Toronto Treed AreaTree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
- Toronto Waterbodies & RiversWater surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
- Ravine & Natural Feature ProtectionRavine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
- Toronto Street Tree InventoryTree count + density inside park polygons.
- Neighbourhood Profiles(Pending) Equity context proxy.
- OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.