Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Eglinton Flats — site photograph
Back to map
Waterfront Parkcluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (large-scale)Mount Dennis (115)confidence moderatereal Toronto data

Eglinton Flats

Waterfront Park, middle of the pack overall (score 35, rank ~54th percentile). Strongest: connectivity; weakest: edge activation.

Aerial — City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

Eglinton Flats scores 35 / 100. Strongest dimensions: connectivity and enclosure / eyes on park. Weakest: edge activation (0). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (100). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors — not a definitive judgment.

Best for:waterfront recreationlong walks

Area · 36.43 ha

Vitality Score
35/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 72%

Data Confidence
35.0 / 100
Citywide
54th
of all 3,273 parks
Among Waterfront Park
68th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
35
median in very large Waterfront Park waterfront (n=44)
Performance gap
+1
raw − expected · context confidence high
typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Explain this score

Where did the 35 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation0 · p50
-12.5
Connectivity76 · p96
+5.1
Border Vacuum Risk100 (risk)
-5.0
Amenity Diversity28 · p95
-4.3
Enclosure / Eyes on Park68 · p65
+1.8
Natural Comfort50 · p58
-0.1

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Eglinton Flats works because its connectivity score (76) is one of the city's strongest and its amenity diversity (28) is also top decile (66 transit stops sit within a 400 m walk; 26 intersections fall within 100 m of the edge).

What limits this park

Eglinton Flats's edges are fronted by border-vacuum land uses (highways, rail, parking, blank institutional) — risk score 100.

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high connectivity (76, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Eglinton Flats sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat — moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • Connectivity (76) significantly outpaces natural comfort (50) — well placed in the city but offers little shade or ecological respite.
  • The park is enclosed by buildings (68) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 0) — frame without animation.
  • 16 nearby towers cast wind and shadow without contributing canopy — passive surveillance is plentiful but human-scale comfort is not.
  • High connectivity coexists with high border-vacuum risk (100) — much of that connectivity is to highways, rail, or parking lots, not to neighbourhoods.

Typology classification

confidence 85%
Waterfront Parkalso reads as Ravine / Naturalized Park

Classified as Waterfront Park: 6% water surface inside park. Secondary read: Ravine / Naturalized Park (100% ravine overlap, 4% canopy).

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
0.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 25 active uses (transit_stop, retail) and 29 dead/hostile uses (highway, parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
75.7 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 23 mapped paths/walkways and 91 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 26 street intersections within 100 m; 66 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 3 estimated access points across ~3,894 m of perimeter. moderate edge density — small superblock penalty applied. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m27
Intersections within 100 m26
Paths/walkways (50 m)23
Sidewalk segments (50 m)91
Transit stops (400 m)66
Estimated entrances3
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter0.69
Park perimeter3,894 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
28.4 / 100

3 distinct amenity types in the park (playground, tennis, washroom). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightmeasured 75%
49.5 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 4.0% estimated tree canopy; 100.0% inside the ravine system; 5.7% water surface; 227 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (6.2/ha). Reading: ravine-cooled. Source coverage: treed_area, ravine, waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage4.0%
Canopy area1.45 ha
Inside ravine system100.0%
Water surface inside park5.7%
Nearest water (if outside park)0 m (inside)
Estimated green94.3%
City-mapped trees inside polygon227
Tree density6.2 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0–100)32.7
Sample points used401

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
67.8 / 100

260 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (8 mid-rise, 236 low-rise, 16 tower); avg edge height 8.8 m (~3 floors); 6.7 buildings per 100 m of 3,894 m perimeter — strong frontage density; edges are low-rise (mostly 2–3 floors); 16 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 8 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m260
Buildings within 50 m260
Avg edge height8.8 m (~3 floors)
Tallest edge building70.3 m
Mid-rise (3–7 floors)8
Low-rise (< 3 floors)236
Towers (≥ 13 floors)16
Frontage density6.68 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge3%
Tower share of edge6%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter3,894 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
100.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: Eglinton Avenue West, parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot, Eglinton Avenue West, parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot, Eglinton Avenue West, Eglinton Avenue West, Eglinton Avenue West, Eglinton Avenue West, Eglinton Avenue West, Eglinton Avenue West, parking_lot, Eglinton Avenue West, Eglinton Avenue West, Eglinton Avenue West, Eglinton Avenue West, Eglinton Avenue West. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" — they suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence — read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (3 types · 3 records)

  • playground
  • tennis
  • washroom

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • parking lot0 m
  • retail — Tennis Club0 m
  • parking lot0 m
  • transit stop — Lambton Avenue3 m
  • transit stop — 120 Emmett Ave at Roadway to West Park Healthcare Centre5 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West5 m
  • transit stop — Emmett Avenue at Eglinton Avenue West5 m
  • parking lot9 m
  • transit stop — Jane Street West Side10 m
  • parking lot12 m
  • transit stop — Eglinton Avenue West at Jane Street East Side12 m
  • transit stop — Emmett Avenue13 m
  • parking lot18 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West20 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West21 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West25 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West25 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West25 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West25 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West25 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West26 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West27 m
  • parking lot29 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West30 m
  • transit stop — Lambton Avenue30 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West33 m
  • transit stop — Eglinton Avenue West35 m
  • parking lot36 m
  • retail — Monica's Beauty Lounge36 m
  • transit stop — Eglinton Avenue West37 m
  • transit stop — Jane Street41 m
  • transit stop — Emmett Avenue41 m
  • transit stop — Jane Street41 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West45 m
  • parking lot48 m
  • parking lot48 m
  • retail — Coin Laundry Maytag Equipped56 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West58 m
  • transit stop — 85 Emmett Avenue59 m
  • transit stop — Beechwood Avenue65 m
  • transit stop — 106 Emmett Avenue68 m
  • parking lot73 m
  • parking lot77 m
  • transit stop — Goldwin Avenue80 m
  • parking lot83 m
  • transit stop — Cornell Avenue86 m
  • parking lot89 m
  • transit stop — Eglinton Avenue West at Walkway to Emmett Avenue89 m
  • transit stop — Opposite 3574 Eglinton Avenue West90 m
  • parking lot90 m
  • retail — Lambton Grocery91 m
  • transit stop — Jane St at Bexley Cres93 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West95 m
  • transit stop — 3574 Eglinton Avenue West96 m
  • parking lot104 m
  • parking lot104 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West106 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West109 m
  • parking lot113 m
  • parking lot118 m
  • parking lot122 m
  • retail — Daily Mart125 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West128 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West139 m
  • transit stop — Verona Avenue141 m
  • parking lot143 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West145 m
  • transit stop — Lambton Avenue145 m
  • parking lot164 m
  • transit stop — Rockcliffe Boulevard168 m
  • parking lot172 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West172 m
  • transit stop — Verona Avenue174 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West181 m
  • parking lot181 m
  • retail — Lambton Convenience186 m
  • transit stop — Jane Street192 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West194 m
  • highway — Eglinton Avenue West198 m
  • retail — Viele Bros. Auto Body200 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureEglinton Flats

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    54th
  • Edge activation
    50th
  • Connectivity
    96th
  • Amenity diversity
    95th
  • Natural comfort
    58th
  • Enclosure
    65th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space — useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals — not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Eglinton Flatsmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter — and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all · 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only — no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions — a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park — playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden — even small additions raise this score.
  • Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

  • City of Toronto Open Data — Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.