David Pecaut Square
Civic Square, one of the city's strongest overall (score 60, rank ~99th percentile). Strongest: edge activation; weakest: natural comfort.
Photo by Manuel Rodil via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026
Data updated
David Pecaut Square scores 59.6 / 100. Strongest dimensions: edge activation and connectivity. Weakest: amenity diversity (35.6). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.
Area · 2.89 ha
What's here
Getting around
2.0 km of mapped path, 100% paved.
13 flights of steps on the mapped network.
No seating mapped in OpenStreetMap.
Nearest parking 6 m away. None of the 11 nearby lots records whether it has accessible spaces.
Path, seating and parking data comes from OpenStreetMap and reflects what volunteers have mapped, not a survey. Absence here means nobody has recorded it. This section does not assess wheelchair access: the relevant OpenStreetMap tag is present on well under 1% of Toronto paths.
Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 68%
Data confidence: moderate
Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.
Loading map…
The parks map is loading.
Public art in this park
1Selections From The Synopsis of Categories
Micah Lexier, 1992
Sculpture · Aluminum
Photo: City of Toronto. Source: City of Toronto Public Art
2Remembered Sustenance
Cynthia Short, 1992
Sculpture · Bronze, Cedar Hedge
Photo: City of Toronto. Source: City of Toronto Public Art
3Surface Design for Tempered Glass Windscreens
Jaan Poldaas, 1992
Sculpture · Tempered Glass
Photo: City of Toronto. Source: City of Toronto Public Art
4The Poet, The Fever Hospital
Bernie Miller, 1992
Sculpture · Bronze, Granite, Steel, Marble
Photo: City of Toronto. Source: City of Toronto Public Art
5Memoire du Futur
Anne Poirier and Patrick Poirier, 1992
Sculpture · Stainless Steel, Mable, Stone
Photo: City of Toronto. Source: City of Toronto Public Art
6Sculpture
Source: OpenStreetMap
Near the park
7Constellation
Albert Paley, 2002
Sculpture · Stainless Steel
Photo: City of Toronto. Source: City of Toronto Public Art
8A History of the Fur Trade in Canada
Douglas Coupland, 2009
Mural / Painting
Photo: City of Toronto. Source: City of Toronto Public Art
9Rail Cuts
Edward Burtynsky, 2009
Photography · Integrated
Photo: City of Toronto. Source: City of Toronto Public Art
Numbers match the pins on the map. Works near the park are within 30 m of its edge.
Explain this score
Where did the 60 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.
Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.
Why this park works
David Pecaut Square works because its edge activation score (76) is one of the city's strongest and its connectivity (68) is also top quartile (its perimeter is lined with active uses).
What limits this park
.
Most distinctive characteristic
Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high edge activation (76, top decile).
Jacobs reading
David Pecaut Square sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.
Tradeoffs
- Connectivity (68) significantly outpaces natural comfort (41): well placed in the city but offers little shade or ecological respite.
- 26 nearby towers cast wind and shadow without contributing canopy: passive surveillance is plentiful but human-scale comfort is not.
Performance in context
- This park is a strong overperformer for its cohort: raw 60 versus an expected 42 for similar parks (medium Civic Square) (gap +18).
Typology classification
Classified as Civic Square: name flags as civic square + 65 buildings frame the edge
Edge Activation
Within 100 m of the park edge: 69 active uses (restaurant, transit_stop, retail, cafe) and 2 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.
Source: OpenStreetMap: cafes, restaurants, shops, schools, community centres, transit, parking, highways, rail. All data sources.
Connectivity
Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 0 mapped paths/walkways and 32 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 14 street intersections within 100 m; 3 subway or GO stations, 11 streetcar or LRT stops, 5 bus stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~720 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.
Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops. All data sources.
Amenity Diversity
3 distinct amenity types in the park (art, garden, washroom). Diversity drives the score, so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use. 6 public artworks in the park and 3 nearby add a bonus for the number of works.
Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags. All data sources.
Natural Comfort
Natural-comfort components for this park: ~6.8% effective canopy (0.0% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); nearest waterbody ~849 m; 28 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (9.7/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).
Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory. All data sources.
Enclosure / Eyes on Park
65 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (25 mid-rise, 14 low-rise, 26 tower); avg edge height 50.0 m (~17 floors); 9.0 buildings per 100 m of 720 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges dominated by towers; 26 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 25 mid-rise edge buildings.
Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights). All data sources.
Border Vacuum Risk
Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: Impark, Impark. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.
Source: OpenStreetMap: highways, rail, parking. All data sources.
Equity Context
Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.
Source: Not loaded yet: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles. All data sources.
Amenities (3 types · 10 records)
- art
- garden
- washroom
Nearby active-edge features (80)
- retail: MetroCentre0 m
- restaurant: Hot dog stand0 m
- restaurant: Subway0 m
- restaurant: Jimmy the Greek0 m
- restaurant: Manchu Wok0 m
- restaurant: Pumpernickel's0 m
- cafe: Tim Hortons0 m
- restaurant: Booster Juice0 m
- restaurant: Harvest Green0 m
- restaurant: Urban Appetite0 m
- restaurant: Soup Nutsy0 m
- retail: EZ Eye Care0 m
- retail0 m
- cafe: Au Pain Doré0 m
- retail: It's A Shoe Repair0 m
- retail: Maoka0 m
- retail: Exton Dry Cleaners0 m
- retail: Corporate Printing Services0 m
- retail: Sutherland-Chan Massage Therapy0 m
- retail: Creative Custom Framing0 m
- restaurant: Harvest Green0 m
- restaurant: Minami0 m
- restaurant: Koha Pacific Kitchen0 m
- parking lot: Impark6 m
- transit stop: John Street10 m
- retail: Tiee Express22 m
- cafe: Second Cup22 m
- restaurant: Aroma Fine Indian Cuisine23 m
- restaurant: Dunn's Famous23 m
- restaurant: Empire Supper Club24 m
- restaurant: Shoeless Joe's24 m
- restaurant: Sunset Grill26 m
- retail: King Fresh Foodmarket26 m
- restaurant: A&W28 m
- restaurant: Oklahoma Burgers29 m
- cafe: Starbucks30 m
- restaurant: Pancho y Emiliano31 m
- restaurant: Milagro Cantina Mexicana32 m
- restaurant: Ritz Bar32 m
- cafe: Bevy@The Combine34 m
- restaurant: Coffee Oysters Champagne35 m
- parking lot: Impark35 m
- retail: International News36 m
- cafe: Starbucks37 m
- restaurant: O&B Canteen38 m
- restaurant: Kinoya39 m
- restaurant: Lobster Burger Bar39 m
- restaurant: Bar 40441 m
- restaurant: Oniwa Sushi41 m
- restaurant: Grill & Wrap43 m
- restaurant: Hey Lucy's Wood Oven Pizza44 m
- restaurant: Lee Chen Asian Bistro45 m
- restaurant: Blü Ristorante46 m
- restaurant: JZ's Pizza47 m
- restaurant: Kit Kat Italian Bar & Grill48 m
- restaurant: Quesada50 m
- restaurant: N'Awlins52 m
- restaurant: The Shore Club52 m
- transit stop: John Street55 m
- restaurant: Thai Room Grand58 m
- restaurant: Charlotte's Room60 m
- retail: Box Office64 m
- restaurant: Mirvish Parking65 m
- restaurant: Byblos Downtown67 m
- retail: tiff Shop68 m
- restaurant: Gabby's73 m
- restaurant: Elephant & Castle74 m
- restaurant: 7 Wonders Fine Foods80 m
- restaurant: Grace O'Malley's93 m
- restaurant: La Diperie94 m
- restaurant: La Fenice99 m
- restaurant: South Street Burger100 m
- transit stop: University Avenue, St. Andrew Station101 m
- parking lot102 m
- cafe: Second Cup106 m
- restaurant: Burgers n' Fries Forever108 m
- restaurant: Nobu109 m
- restaurant: Freshly Squeezed114 m
- retail: International News116 m
- retail: Marketplace116 m
Park profile
Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.
Citywide percentile ranks
Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.
- Overall vitality99th
- Edge activation99th
- Connectivity88th
- Amenity diversity88th
- Natural comfort37th
- Enclosure51th
Most similar parks
Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.
- Courthouse Square ParkCivic Square58
- Arena GardensUrban Plaza63
- Trinity SquareCivic Square61
- Graham ParkUrban Plaza65
- Berczy ParkCivic Square68
Most opposite parks
Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.
- Trca Lands ( 26)Ravine / Naturalized Park27
- Toronto Islands - Muggs Island ParkRavine / Naturalized Park26
- Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park26
- Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park28
- Trca Lands ( 17)Ravine / Naturalized Park24
Visitor signals
Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.
“Tree-lined plaza often used for concerts, with a steel & granite sculpture by Bernie Miller.” (Google editorial summary)
p92 citywide · p79 within Civic Square
Source: Google Places API · match high (0.97 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.
Human activity signals: not available
No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.
Does this score feel accurate?
Your read of David Pecaut Square matters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.
Tell us how this park feels
We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.
What would improve this park?
Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.
- Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
- Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.
Data sources
- City of Toronto Open Data: Green SpacesPolygon boundaries, official names, land classes. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
- Parks & Recreation FacilitiesInventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
- Toronto Pedestrian NetworkSidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
- Toronto Centreline V2Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
- Toronto 3D MassingBuilding footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
- Toronto Treed AreaTree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
- Toronto Waterbodies & RiversWater surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
- Ravine & Natural Feature ProtectionRavine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
- Toronto Street Tree InventoryTree count + density inside park polygons.
- OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.