Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Dufferin Grove Park, site photograph
Back to map
Neighbourhood Parkcluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (enclosure-leaning)Dufferin Grove (83)confidence moderate

Dufferin Grove Park

Neighbourhood Park, one of the city's strongest overall (score 68, rank ~100th percentile). Strongest: amenity diversity; weakest: natural comfort.

Photo by Enerio Rodriguez via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026

Dufferin Grove Park scores 67.6 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: edge activation (53.8). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best fordaily urban lifefamilies

Area · 5.62 ha

What's here

Recreation
PlaygroundSports fieldTennisBasketballSkateparkPoolIce rinkTable tennis
Facilities
WashroomDrinking waterPicnic areaBBQShelterBenches
Vitality Score
68/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 70%

Data Confidence
67.6 / 100
Citywide
100th
of all 3,788 parks
Among Neighbourhood Park
100th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
39
median in large Neighbourhood Park (n=71)
Performance gap
+28
raw − expected · context confidence high
strong overperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map. Connectivity, transit, and edge conditions read at a glance.
Dufferin Grove Park, aerial top-down view
Top-down view.City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px. Reads the park’s footprint, paths, treed area, and edge conditions from above. City of Toronto Orthophoto · cot_ortho most-current MapServer · cached 5/9/2026.

Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Explain this score

Where did the 68 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Connectivity82 · p99
+6.4
Border Vacuum Risk12 (risk)
+3.8
Enclosure / Eyes on Park82 · p88
+3.2
Amenity Diversity63 · p100
+2.5
Edge Activation54 · p97
+0.9
Natural Comfort55 · p71
+0.7

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Dufferin Grove Park works because its amenity diversity score (63) is one of the city's strongest and its connectivity (82) is also top decile (14 distinct amenity types support different kinds of use).

What limits this park

Dufferin Grove Park doesn't have a clear weakness. Every measured dimension is at or above the middle of the pack.

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high amenity diversity (63, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Dufferin Grove Park is a balanced hybrid: strong urban integration (73) and meaningful natural comfort (65). Rare in the Toronto Park Catalogue.

Tradeoffs

  • Connectivity (82) significantly outpaces natural comfort (55): well placed in the city but offers little shade or ecological respite.

Performance in context

  • This park is a strong overperformer for its cohort: raw 68 versus an expected 39 for similar parks (large Neighbourhood Park) (gap +28).

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Neighbourhood Park

Classified as Neighbourhood Park: 5.6 ha, framed by 33 mid-rise vs 1 towers

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
53.8 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 21 active uses (retail, cafe, transit_stop) and 3 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
81.8 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 25 mapped paths/walkways and 50 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 19 street intersections within 100 m; 27 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 18 estimated access points across ~1,030 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m17
Intersections within 100 m19
Paths/walkways (50 m)25
Sidewalk segments (50 m)50
Transit stops (400 m)27
Estimated entrances18
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter1.65
Park perimeter1,030 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
62.7 / 100

14 distinct amenity types in the park (basketball, picnic, playground, skatepark, tennis, washroom, …). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightpartial 60%
54.7 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: ~20.8% effective canopy (9.7% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); 167 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (29.7/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: treed_area, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage9.7%
Canopy area0.54 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)1,500 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon167
Tree density29.7 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)45.9
Sample points used258

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
82.2 / 100

145 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (33 mid-rise, 111 low-rise, 1 tower); avg edge height 8.3 m (~3 floors); 14.1 buildings per 100 m of 1,030 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are low-rise (mostly 2 to 3 floors); 1 tower ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 33 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m145
Buildings within 50 m145
Avg edge height8.3 m (~3 floors)
Tallest edge building44.9 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)33
Low-rise (< 3 floors)111
Towers (≥ 13 floors)1
Frontage density14.07 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge23%
Tower share of edge1%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter1,030 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
12.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (14 types · 37 records)

  • basketball
  • picnic
  • playground
  • skatepark
  • tennis
  • washroom
  • bbq
  • bench
  • drinking water
  • ice rink
  • pool
  • shelter
  • sports field
  • table tennis

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • transit stop: Dufferin St at Dufferin Park Ave1 m
  • transit stop: Dufferin St at Sylvan Ave4 m
  • transit stop: Sylvan Avenue16 m
  • transit stop: Dufferin Mall21 m
  • transit stop: Dufferin St at Dufferin Park Ave30 m
  • parking lot32 m
  • retail: Marshalls35 m
  • retail: Urban Customz47 m
  • parking lot: Dufferin Mall Parking (two levels)53 m
  • cafe: Big Orange55 m
  • retail: MobileCare72 m
  • parking lot: Dufferin Mall Parking74 m
  • retail: Portage74 m
  • retail: Dollarama76 m
  • retail: Mark's76 m
  • retail: Express Yourself78 m
  • retail: LinsonQ80 m
  • retail: Hearing Solutions82 m
  • retail: Mas Man83 m
  • retail: Karen's Fine Jewellery85 m
  • retail: Ardene90 m
  • retail: INS Market90 m
  • retail96 m
  • cafe: Tim Hortons100 m
  • parking lot101 m
  • parking lot102 m
  • retail: Eye on Optical107 m
  • retail: Champs113 m
  • restaurant: McDonald's113 m
  • retail: Gap113 m
  • cafe: Zaza Espresso Bar116 m
  • transit stop: Croatia Street120 m
  • restaurant: KFC121 m
  • retail: Shefield Express127 m
  • retail: Trade Secrets135 m
  • retail: Batteries N' Gadgets138 m
  • retail: Miniso139 m
  • retail: Pandora146 m
  • retail: Kibo Market154 m
  • parking lot155 m
  • restaurant: Pizza Pizza158 m
  • restaurant: Villa Madina158 m
  • restaurant: New York Fries158 m
  • retail: Foot Locker159 m
  • restaurant: Subway159 m
  • retail: Aura Fragrances159 m
  • retail: Pasito159 m
  • retail: La Senza159 m
  • retail: Call It Spring159 m
  • retail: Journeys160 m
  • retail: Soft Moc160 m
  • retail: claire's160 m
  • retail: Tommy Hilfiger160 m
  • retail: Stars160 m
  • retail: Peoples Jewellers161 m
  • retail: Suzy Shier Le Chateau161 m
  • restaurant: Shanghai 360162 m
  • retail: Signalwave162 m
  • retail: Telus163 m
  • restaurant: Mr. Pretzels164 m
  • restaurant: Cinnabon165 m
  • cafe: Cotti Coffee165 m
  • retail: Michael Hill165 m
  • retail: Swarovski165 m
  • retail: Lids166 m
  • retail: The Soap Tree166 m
  • retail: Fido167 m
  • restaurant: Thaï Express167 m
  • retail: Freedom Mobile168 m
  • retail: Goodtime Jewellers168 m
  • retail: Casefit168 m
  • retail: WirelessWave168 m
  • retail: Face Off168 m
  • retail: The Brow Boutique168 m
  • retail: Tbooth Wireless168 m
  • retail: Tbooth Wireless168 m
  • restaurant: Tanghulu Tanghulu168 m
  • retail: Showcase169 m
  • retail: Virgin Plus169 m
  • retail: Mulu170 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureDufferin Grove Park
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    100th
  • Edge activation
    97th
  • Connectivity
    99th
  • Amenity diversity
    100th
  • Natural comfort
    71th
  • Enclosure
    88th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Visitor signals

Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.

Large park with an ice rink & playground, plus basketball, picnic areas & a weekly farmer's market. (Google editorial summary)

Visitor signal score82 / 100
82.1 / 100

p96 citywide · p94 within Neighbourhood Park

Volume (saturated)81
Density / ha79
Rating contribution88
Match dampener×1.00
Average rating
★ 4.5
out of 5
Ratings collected
2,077
total reviews
Photos uploaded
10
total contributors

Source: Google Places API · match unverified (0.00 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.

Human activity signals

Programming, social attention, temporal rhythm, and nearby pedestrian / cycling flow. An experimental aggregate layer that complements the spatial scores. Partial coverage, partial confidence.

sample illustrative dataconfidence 25%
Overall activity64 / 100
64.1 / 100
Programming / events
77sample
Social attention
57sample
Temporal rhythm
65sample
Pedestrian / cycling flow
55sample
Cultural significance
60sample

Activity reading: 80 events/yr (40 recurring); 2,400 public mentions; pedestrian intensity 55/100; cycling/trail 50/100. The strongest signal is programmed civic use. These are illustrative sample values. Calibrate before citing.

Sample data: numbers shown here are an illustrative fixture for the 10 named parks, not a measurement.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Dufferin Grove Parkmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • This park already scores well across all measured dimensions.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.