
Wells Hill Park
Parkette, one of the city's strongest overall (score 65, rank ~100th percentile). Strongest: connectivity; weakest: natural comfort.
Photo by martinaz Joice via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026
Wells Hill Park scores 65.1 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: amenity diversity (43.2). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.
Area · 0.88 ha
What's here
Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 68%
Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.
Loading map…
The parks map is loading.
Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).
Explain this score
Where did the 65 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.
Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.
Why this park works
Wells Hill Park works because its connectivity score (79) is one of the city's strongest and its edge activation (55) is also top decile (37 transit stops sit within a 400 m walk; 12 intersections fall within 100 m of the edge).
What limits this park
Wells Hill Park doesn't have a clear weakness. Every measured dimension is at or above the middle of the pack.
Most distinctive characteristic
Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high connectivity (79, top decile).
Jacobs reading
Wells Hill Park is a balanced hybrid: strong urban integration (75) and meaningful natural comfort (67). Rare in the Toronto Park Catalogue.
Tradeoffs
- Connectivity (79) significantly outpaces natural comfort (53): well placed in the city but offers little shade or ecological respite.
Performance in context
- This park is a strong overperformer for its cohort: raw 65 versus an expected 37 for similar parks (small Parkette) (gap +28).
Typology classification
Classified as Parkette: small (8842 m²) with strong building frontage (18.0 per 100 m)
Edge Activation
Within 100 m of the park edge: 10 active uses (retail, transit_stop, restaurant) and 1 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.
Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use
Connectivity
Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 13 mapped paths/walkways and 29 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 12 street intersections within 100 m; 37 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 11 estimated access points across ~434 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.
Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops
Amenity Diversity
6 distinct amenity types in the park (picnic, playground, tennis, washroom, bench, drinking_water). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.
Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags
Natural Comfort
Natural-comfort components for this park: ~20.3% effective canopy (0.0% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); nearest waterbody ~553 m; 29 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (29.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).
Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory
Enclosure / Eyes on Park
78 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (26 mid-rise, 48 low-rise, 4 tower); avg edge height 12.3 m (~4 floors); 18.0 buildings per 100 m of 434 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are at a Jacobs-scale walkable mid-rise (3 to 7 floors); 4 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 26 mid-rise edge buildings.
Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)
Border Vacuum Risk
Park edges face the city. No significant border vacuum detected.
Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints
Equity Context
Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.
Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles
Amenities (6 types · 22 records)
- picnic
- playground
- tennis
- washroom
- bench
- drinking water
Nearby active-edge features (51)
- retail: Joe Fresh37 m
- retail: Loblaws44 m
- transit stop: Bathurst55 m
- transit stop: Bathurst56 m
- transit stop: St. Clair Av West, South Entrance58 m
- parking lot65 m
- restaurant: A&W70 m
- transit stop: St. Clair Av West, North Entrance71 m
- retail: LCBO78 m
- restaurant: Popeyes79 m
- transit stop: St. Clair West Station99 m
- retail: Annex RMT100 m
- transit stop: St. Clair West Station109 m
- transit stop: St. Clair West Station114 m
- parking lot114 m
- restaurant: Urban Fare Catering & Food Shop115 m
- retail: INS Market116 m
- retail: Freedom Mobile116 m
- transit stop: Bathurst St at St Clair Ave West117 m
- transit stop: Bathurst St at St Clair Ave West118 m
- retail: Blue Paisley Fine Rugs120 m
- transit stop: St. Clair West120 m
- retail: Dollarama122 m
- parking lot123 m
- restaurant: Osmow's124 m
- cafe: Bakery Garden Café124 m
- retail: Fantasy Dry Cleaning & Alteration128 m
- transit stop: St. Clair West Station130 m
- restaurant: Pizza Del Arte130 m
- restaurant: Harvey's133 m
- parking lot133 m
- retail: Clairhurst Eye Care138 m
- transit stop: St. Clair West Station143 m
- retail: Evergreen Natural Foods146 m
- transit stop: Bathurst149 m
- transit stop: Bathurst150 m
- transit stop: Helena Avenue150 m
- restaurant: Booyah154 m
- restaurant: Wychwood Pub157 m
- retail: Neighbors Market162 m
- retail: Pet Mama170 m
- retail: Source Organics178 m
- retail: Wine Rack181 m
- retail: Prayasha186 m
- transit stop: Tweedsmuir192 m
- transit stop: Tweedsmuir Avenue193 m
- restaurant: Kiyo Japanese Cuisine193 m
- transit stop: Vaughan194 m
- transit stop: Vaughan195 m
- retail: Knit-O-Matic198 m
- retail: Golden Hangar Cleaners199 m
Park profile
Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.
Citywide percentile ranks
Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.
- Overall vitality100th
- Edge activation97th
- Connectivity98th
- Amenity diversity94th
- Natural comfort68th
- Enclosure97th
Most similar parks
Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.
- St. James ParkNeighbourhood Park61
- Dundas - Watkinson ParketteUrban Plaza61
- Grange ParkNeighbourhood Park65
- Charles G. Williams ParkUrban Plaza61
- Art Eggleton ParkUrban Plaza61
Most opposite parks
Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.
- Toronto Islands - Muggs Island ParkRavine / Naturalized Park25
- Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park21
- Trca Lands ( 26)Ravine / Naturalized Park27
- Rouge ParkWaterfront Park25
- Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park28
Visitor signals
Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.
“Trees stud this low-key park offering picnic tables & a children's playground & wading pool.” (Google editorial summary)
p81 citywide · p85 within Parkette
Source: Google Places API · match unverified (0.00 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.
Human activity signals: not available
No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.
Does this score feel accurate?
Your read of Wells Hill Parkmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.
Tell us how this park feels
We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.
What would improve this park?
Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.
- Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
Data sources
- City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
- Parks & Recreation FacilitiesInventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
- Toronto Pedestrian NetworkSidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
- Toronto Centreline V2Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
- Toronto 3D MassingBuilding footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
- Toronto Treed AreaTree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
- Toronto Waterbodies & RiversWater surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
- Ravine & Natural Feature ProtectionRavine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
- Toronto Street Tree InventoryTree count + density inside park polygons.
- Neighbourhood Profiles(Pending) Equity context proxy.
- OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.