Vermont Square Park
Civic Square, one of the city's strongest overall (score 67, rank ~100th percentile). Strongest: amenity diversity; weakest: natural comfort.
Photo by Aldo Andrade via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026
Vermont Square Park scores 66.7 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: edge activation (54). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.
Area · 1.78 ha
What's here
Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 72%
Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.
Loading map…
The parks map is loading.
Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).
Explain this score
Where did the 67 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.
Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.
Why this park works
Vermont Square Park works because its amenity diversity score (58) is one of the city's strongest and its edge activation (54) is also top decile (11 distinct amenity types support different kinds of use).
What limits this park
Vermont Square Park doesn't have a clear weakness. Every measured dimension is at or above the middle of the pack.
Most distinctive characteristic
Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high amenity diversity (58, top decile).
Jacobs reading
Vermont Square Park is a balanced hybrid: strong urban integration (72) and meaningful natural comfort (69). Rare in the Toronto Park Catalogue.
Performance in context
- This park is a strong overperformer for its cohort: raw 67 versus an expected 41 for similar parks (medium Civic Square) (gap +26).
Typology classification
Classified as Civic Square: name flags as civic square + 155 buildings frame the edge. Secondary read: Neighbourhood Park (1.8 ha, framed by 37 mid-rise vs 0 towers).
Edge Activation
Within 100 m of the park edge: 14 active uses (cafe, retail, restaurant, transit_stop) and 2 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.
Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use
Connectivity
Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 8 mapped paths/walkways and 23 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 28 street intersections within 100 m; 15 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 8 estimated access points across ~572 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.
Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops
Amenity Diversity
11 distinct amenity types in the park (community_centre, dog_area, picnic, playground, tennis, bench, …). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.
Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags
Natural Comfort
Natural-comfort components for this park: ~34.2% effective canopy (2.4% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); nearest waterbody ~773 m; 87 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (48.9/ha). Reading: partially shaded. Source coverage: treed_area, waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).
Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory
Enclosure / Eyes on Park
155 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (37 mid-rise, 118 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 8.0 m (~3 floors); 27.1 buildings per 100 m of 572 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are low-rise (mostly 2 to 3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 37 mid-rise edge buildings.
Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)
Border Vacuum Risk
Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.
Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints
Equity Context
Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.
Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles
Amenities (11 types · 29 records)
- community centre
- dog area
- picnic
- playground
- tennis
- bench
- drinking water
- ice rink
- pool
- sports field
- table tennis
Nearby active-edge features (60)
- parking lot25 m
- parking lot76 m
- restaurant: KOS Cafe and Restaurant85 m
- retail: Alligator Party Rental90 m
- retail: Transmission Auto Repair91 m
- retail: Minerva Cannabis92 m
- restaurant: Gordo Ex92 m
- retail: Sonie's Creations92 m
- retail: Toutoune Gallery & Shop93 m
- retail: Micro Zoomiez93 m
- cafe: Chaveta Coffee93 m
- retail: Steven's Grocery93 m
- retail94 m
- retail: Mister Dupont96 m
- transit stop: Bathurst St at Wells St98 m
- retail: Story Planet98 m
- retail: F.G. Chong Dry Cleaners & Alterations107 m
- restaurant: El Pocho Antojitos Bar110 m
- retail: Studio 976 Hair Salon110 m
- retail: David Dunkley Fine Millinery113 m
- parking lot114 m
- transit stop: Palmerston Avenue116 m
- retail: Live Art Space118 m
- retail118 m
- retail: Barbara Edwards Contemporary121 m
- restaurant: Grapefruit Moon121 m
- retail: Tattoo People122 m
- transit stop: Bathurst St at Wells St122 m
- retail: Gussied Up124 m
- retail: Mrs. Huizenga124 m
- retail: Art Market126 m
- retail: The Showroom128 m
- retail: John's Shoe Repair135 m
- retail: Spring Nails & Spa135 m
- retail: Qalat138 m
- retail: BC-PC Technology Systems139 m
- restaurant: Napolitan Pizzeria142 m
- retail: Flur146 m
- retail149 m
- retail: Steve's Custom Tailor & Cleaner149 m
- transit stop: Dupont St at Bathurst St149 m
- restaurant: Rapido150 m
- retail: La Parete Gallery153 m
- restaurant: Detroit Pizzeria156 m
- transit stop: Bathurst Street at Dupont Street159 m
- parking lot161 m
- retail: Catherine Curtis165 m
- parking lot169 m
- restaurant: Miya Bhai169 m
- restaurant: Domino's173 m
- transit stop: Bathurst Street at Dupont Street174 m
- retail: Auto Expert Auto Service178 m
- retail: OK Tire179 m
- transit stop: Dupont St at Bathurst St180 m
- parking lot182 m
- restaurant: Vesta Lunch187 m
- retail187 m
- cafe: Tim Hortons189 m
- transit stop: Manning Avenue190 m
- retail: Mini Coin Laundry197 m
Park profile
Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.
Citywide percentile ranks
Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.
- Overall vitality100th
- Edge activation97th
- Connectivity96th
- Amenity diversity99th
- Natural comfort78th
- Enclosure92th
Most similar parks
Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.
- Dufferin Grove ParkNeighbourhood Park68
- Trace Manes ParkNeighbourhood Park59
- Wells Hill ParkParkette65
- Hillcrest ParkNeighbourhood Park69
- Trinity Bellwoods ParkNeighbourhood Park66
Most opposite parks
Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.
- Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park21
- Toronto Islands - Muggs Island ParkRavine / Naturalized Park25
- Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park18
- Trca Lands ( 58)Waterfront Park18
- Trca Lands ( 26)Ravine / Naturalized Park27
Visitor signals
Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.
p84 citywide · p52 within Civic Square
Source: Google Places API · match unverified (0.00 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.
Human activity signals: not available
No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.
Does this score feel accurate?
Your read of Vermont Square Parkmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.
Tell us how this park feels
We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.
What would improve this park?
Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.
- This park already scores well across all measured dimensions.
Data sources
- City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
- Parks & Recreation FacilitiesInventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
- Toronto Pedestrian NetworkSidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
- Toronto Centreline V2Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
- Toronto 3D MassingBuilding footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
- Toronto Treed AreaTree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
- Toronto Waterbodies & RiversWater surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
- Ravine & Natural Feature ProtectionRavine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
- Toronto Street Tree InventoryTree count + density inside park polygons.
- Neighbourhood Profiles(Pending) Equity context proxy.
- OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.