JOHN MCKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds
Tower-Community Green Space, middle of the pack overall (score 35, rank ~50th percentile). Strongest: enclosure; weakest: natural comfort.
No photograph yet. If you have one of JOHN MCKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds, we would like to use it.
Submit a photoAerial, City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026
Data updated
JOHN MCKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds scores 34.6 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: edge activation (0). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.
Area · 0.11 ha
Getting around
No walking paths mapped in OpenStreetMap.
No seating mapped in OpenStreetMap.
Nearest parking 100 m away. None of the 9 nearby lots records whether it has accessible spaces.
Path, seating and parking data comes from OpenStreetMap and reflects what volunteers have mapped, not a survey. Absence here means nobody has recorded it. This section does not assess wheelchair access: the relevant OpenStreetMap tag is present on well under 1% of Toronto paths.
Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 57%
Data confidence: moderate
Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.
Loading map…
The parks map is loading.Grounds of a City building, not a designated park. It is left out of park rankings.
Near the park
1Empress Collonettes
Randy and Berenicci, 1998
Architecture / Landscape · copper plate
Photo: City of Toronto. Source: City of Toronto Public Art
Numbers match the pins on the map. Works near the park are within 30 m of its edge.
Explain this score
Where did the 35 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.
Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.
Why this park works
JOHN MCKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds works because its enclosure score (82) is in the top tier and its connectivity (55) is also above-average (2 mid-rise buildings frame the edge with passive surveillance).
What limits this park
JOHN MCKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds is held back by natural comfort (34, bottom quartile): only 0% canopy means little summer shade.
Most distinctive characteristic
Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high enclosure (82, top quartile).
Jacobs reading
JOHN MCKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.
Tradeoffs
- The park is enclosed by buildings (82) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 0): frame without animation.
- 11 nearby towers cast wind and shadow without contributing canopy: passive surveillance is plentiful but human-scale comfort is not.
Typology classification
Classified as Tower-Community Green Space: 11 towers vs 2 mid-rise within 25 m on a 0.1 ha park. Secondary read: Urban Plaza (1096 m², paved (0% canopy), 29.2 buildings/100 m).
Edge Activation
Within 100 m of the park edge: 0 active uses (none) and 1 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.
Source: OpenStreetMap: cafes, restaurants, shops, schools, community centres, transit, parking, highways, rail. All data sources.
Connectivity
Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 7 mapped paths/walkways and 8 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 9 street intersections within 100 m; 1 subway or GO station, 4 bus stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~133 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.
Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops. All data sources.
Amenity Diversity
No amenities recorded. 1 public artwork near the park adds a bonus for the number of works.
Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags. All data sources.
Natural Comfort
Natural-comfort components for this park: ~2.8% effective canopy (0.0% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); nearest waterbody ~1479 m; 4 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (4.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).
Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory. All data sources.
Enclosure / Eyes on Park
39 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (2 mid-rise, 26 low-rise, 11 tower); avg edge height 19.5 m (~7 floors); 29.2 buildings per 100 m of 133 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are at a Jacobs-scale walkable mid-rise (3 to 7 floors); 11 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 2 mid-rise edge buildings.
Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights). All data sources.
Border Vacuum Risk
Park edges face the city. No significant border vacuum detected.
Source: OpenStreetMap: highways, rail, parking. All data sources.
Equity Context
Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.
Source: Not loaded yet: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles. All data sources.
Amenities (0)
No amenities recorded for this park.
Nearby active-edge features (39)
- parking lot100 m
- retail: I Cosmetic109 m
- retail: The Printing House110 m
- parking lot110 m
- retail112 m
- parking lot124 m
- parking lot131 m
- restaurant: Ajisen Ramen131 m
- restaurant: Subway132 m
- restaurant: Evivva Restaurant Breakfast & Lunch133 m
- transit stop: Yonge Street at Norton Avenue147 m
- restaurant: Daldongnae Korean BBQ150 m
- parking lot150 m
- restaurant: Honeymoon Dessert152 m
- restaurant: Good Taste Casserole Rice152 m
- cafe: ITS TEA155 m
- restaurant: Yunshang Rice Noodle156 m
- retail: Hermosa Medical Esthetics157 m
- parking lot159 m
- restaurant: Yungshang Rice Noodles164 m
- retail: Elysia Beauty Bar165 m
- restaurant: Yang's Braised Chicken Rice165 m
- retail: North York Ink166 m
- parking lot167 m
- highway: Yonge Street170 m
- retail: Pixel Ink Tattoo172 m
- restaurant: 43° N BBQ Bar172 m
- retail: sis² by Love173 m
- cafe: A Corner Cafe175 m
- highway: Yonge Street176 m
- transit stop: Yonge Street at Ellerslie Avenue176 m
- retail: 依 e's Beauty Studio180 m
- retail: Unicorn Pâtisserie & Lounge180 m
- parking lot186 m
- retail: Lucullus188 m
- restaurant: Pho Dac Biet192 m
- retail: Pet Valu193 m
- retail: Tavazo Dried Nuts & Fruits193 m
- parking lot199 m
Park profile
Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.
Citywide percentile ranks
Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.
- Overall vitality50th
- Edge activation62th
- Connectivity68th
- Amenity diversity51th
- Natural comfort20th
- Enclosure87th
Most similar parks
Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.
- ST. ALPHONSUS CATHOLIC SECONDARY SCHOOL - Building GroundsParkette33
- Coe Hill Drive ParketteUrban Plaza30
- Oates ParkUrban Plaza34
- Rosedale Ravine LandsRavine / Naturalized Park33
- Rosedale Ravine LandsRavine / Naturalized Park35
Most opposite parks
Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.
- Kew GardensNeighbourhood Park76
- Toronto ZooWaterfront Park68
- Toronto Islands - Centre Island ParkWaterfront Park56
- Toronto Islands - Island ParkWaterfront Park58
- Bellevue Square ParkCivic Square73
Human activity signals: not available
No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.
Does this score feel accurate?
Your read of JOHN MCKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds matters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.
Tell us how this park feels
We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.
What would improve this park?
Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.
- Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
- Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
- Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.
Data sources
- City of Toronto Open Data: Green SpacesPolygon boundaries, official names, land classes. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
- Parks & Recreation FacilitiesInventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
- Toronto Pedestrian NetworkSidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
- Toronto Centreline V2Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
- Toronto 3D MassingBuilding footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
- Toronto Treed AreaTree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
- Toronto Waterbodies & RiversWater surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
- Ravine & Natural Feature ProtectionRavine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
- Toronto Street Tree InventoryTree count + density inside park polygons.
- OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.