Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Jean Augustine Park, site photograph
Back to map
Othercluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (enclosure-leaning)Mimico (includes Humber Bay Shores) (17)confidence moderate

Jean Augustine Park

Other, middle of the pack overall (score 35, rank ~51th percentile). Strongest: connectivity; weakest: enclosure.

Photo by Shu Lin via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026

Jean Augustine Park scores 34.6 / 100. Strongest dimensions: connectivity and natural comfort. Weakest: edge activation (6). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (100). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best forvaries (see metrics)

Area · 1.63 ha

What's here

Facilities
Drinking waterBenches
Vitality Score
35/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 68%

Data Confidence
34.6 / 100
Citywide
51st
of all 3,788 parks
Among Other
84th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
30
median in medium Other (n=181)
Performance gap
+5
raw − expected · context confidence high
typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map. Connectivity, transit, and edge conditions read at a glance.
Jean Augustine Park, aerial top-down view
Top-down view.City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px. Reads the park’s footprint, paths, treed area, and edge conditions from above. City of Toronto Orthophoto · cot_ortho most-current MapServer · cached 5/9/2026.

Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Explain this score

Where did the 35 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation6 · p65
-11.0
Amenity Diversity20 · p68
-6.0
Border Vacuum Risk100 (risk)
-5.0
Connectivity71 · p93
+4.2
Natural Comfort61 · p78
+1.7
Enclosure / Eyes on Park57 · p30
+0.7

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Jean Augustine Park works because its connectivity score (71) is in the top tier and its natural comfort (61) is also top quartile (16 transit stops sit within a 400 m walk).

What limits this park

Jean Augustine Park is held back by enclosure (57, below-average); border-vacuum risk is also elevated (100).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high connectivity (71, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Jean Augustine Park sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • High connectivity coexists with high border-vacuum risk (100): much of that connectivity is to highways, rail, or parking lots, not to neighbourhoods.

Performance in context

  • Although its citywide rank is low (51st), it ranks highly among similar others (84th): strong for what it is, even if the absolute score is moderate.

Typology classification

confidence 30%
Other

Classified as Other: does not meet any specific typology threshold (1.6 ha, 2 amenity types, frontage 4.7/100m)

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
6.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 14 active uses (transit_stop, restaurant, cafe, retail) and 8 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot, highway). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
71.2 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 31 mapped paths/walkways and 27 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 5 street intersections within 100 m; 16 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 14 estimated access points across ~815 m of perimeter. moderate edge density, small superblock penalty applied. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m6
Intersections within 100 m5
Paths/walkways (50 m)31
Sidewalk segments (50 m)27
Transit stops (400 m)16
Estimated entrances14
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter0.74
Park perimeter815 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
19.9 / 100

2 distinct amenity types in the park (bench, drinking_water). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightpartial 45%
61.0 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: ~34.0% effective canopy (0.0% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); nearest waterbody ~163 m; 79 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (48.6/ha). Reading: water-cooled. Source coverage: waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage0.0%
Canopy area0.00 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)163 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon79
Tree density48.6 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)0.0
Sample points used114

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
56.9 / 100

38 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (11 mid-rise, 8 low-rise, 19 tower); avg edge height 34.7 m (~12 floors); 4.7 buildings per 100 m of 815 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges lean tall but still framed; 19 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 11 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m38
Buildings within 50 m38
Avg edge height34.7 m (~12 floors)
Tallest edge building92.9 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)11
Low-rise (< 3 floors)8
Towers (≥ 13 floors)19
Frontage density4.66 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge29%
Tower share of edge50%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter815 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
100.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot, Lake Shore Boulevard West, Lake Shore Boulevard West, Lake Shore Boulevard West. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (2 types · 11 records)

  • bench
  • drinking water

Nearby active-edge features (59)

  • highway: Lake Shore Boulevard West19 m
  • retail: Grenadier Convenience20 m
  • highway: Lake Shore Boulevard West24 m
  • transit stop28 m
  • parking lot31 m
  • transit stop: Marine Parade Dr at Lake Shore Blvd W34 m
  • highway: Lake Shore Boulevard West47 m
  • transit stop: 2111 Lake Shore Boulevard West49 m
  • retail: Inspire Vision Care49 m
  • restaurant: Vos Restaurante Argentino Steakhouse51 m
  • highway: Lake Shore Boulevard West52 m
  • highway: Lake Shore Boulevard West57 m
  • retail: Sash + Co69 m
  • retail: Platis Cleaners74 m
  • restaurant: Eden Trattoria80 m
  • highway: Lake Shore Boulevard West87 m
  • retail: Posh Beauty Studio89 m
  • restaurant: Ono Poké Bar89 m
  • retail: Sherrry's Nails & Spa92 m
  • highway: Lake Shore Boulevard West92 m
  • cafe: Gravity Pizza Cafe93 m
  • retail: Distinguished Gents98 m
  • highway: Lake Shore Boulevard West101 m
  • highway: Gardiner Expressway101 m
  • highway: Lake Shore Boulevard West102 m
  • retail: Upper Mgmt125 m
  • retail: Rabba Fine Foods126 m
  • highway: Lake Shore Boulevard West127 m
  • transit stop: Marine Parade Drive128 m
  • transit stop129 m
  • cafe: Pauls Coffee130 m
  • highway: Gardiner Expressway131 m
  • retail: Studio Connect131 m
  • highway: Gardiner Expressway132 m
  • retail: Humber Bay Eyecare133 m
  • highway: Gardiner Expressway134 m
  • retail: Vape 100134 m
  • restaurant: Casa Boho135 m
  • highway: Gardiner Expressway140 m
  • retail: Pluto Plants142 m
  • rail: Oakville Subdivision145 m
  • highway: Gardiner Expressway145 m
  • restaurant: Firkin on the Bay147 m
  • rail148 m
  • rail: Oakville Subdivision149 m
  • rail: Oakville Subdivision152 m
  • retail: Ace of Spades Weed Limited154 m
  • highway: Gardiner Expressway157 m
  • highway: Lake Shore Boulevard West158 m
  • highway: Gardiner Expressway160 m
  • rail160 m
  • rail162 m
  • cafe: BB Cafe167 m
  • rail: Oakville Subdivision175 m
  • rail: Oakville Subdivision179 m
  • rail: Oakville Subdivision183 m
  • rail: Oakville Subdivision187 m
  • highway: Lake Shore Boulevard West197 m
  • parking lot198 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureJean Augustine Park
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    51th
  • Edge activation
    65th
  • Connectivity
    93th
  • Amenity diversity
    68th
  • Natural comfort
    78th
  • Enclosure
    30th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Visitor signals

Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.

high-confidence match
Visitor signal score34 / 100
33.7 / 100

p26 citywide · p80 within Other

Volume (saturated)5
Density / ha13
Rating contribution93
Match dampener×1.00
Average rating
★ 4.7
out of 5
Ratings collected
25
total reviews
Photos uploaded
10
total contributors

Source: Google Places API · match high (0.94 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Jean Augustine Parkmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.