Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
York Mills Park — site photograph
Back to map
Waterfront Parkcluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (large-scale)Bridle Path-Sunnybrook-York Mills (41)confidence moderatereal Toronto data

York Mills Park

Waterfront Park, middle of the pack overall (score 31, rank ~34th percentile). Strongest: connectivity; weakest: edge activation.

Aerial — City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

York Mills Park scores 30.8 / 100. Strongest dimensions: connectivity and enclosure / eyes on park. Weakest: amenity diversity (0). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (100). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors — not a definitive judgment.

Best for:waterfront recreationlong walks

Area · 4.25 ha

Vitality Score
31/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 63%

Data Confidence
30.8 / 100
Citywide
34th
of all 3,273 parks
Among Waterfront Park
49th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
30
median in medium Waterfront Park waterfront (n=126)
Performance gap
+1
raw − expected · context confidence high
typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Explain this score

Where did the 31 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation0 · p34
-12.5
Amenity Diversity0 · p41
-10.0
Connectivity76 · p96
+5.1
Border Vacuum Risk100 (risk)
-5.0
Natural Comfort62 · p76
+1.8
Enclosure / Eyes on Park64 · p56
+1.4

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

York Mills Park works because its connectivity score (76) is one of the city's strongest and its natural comfort (62) is also top quartile (34 transit stops sit within a 400 m walk; 17 intersections fall within 100 m of the edge).

What limits this park

York Mills Park is held back by edge activation (0, below-average)— the surrounding streets carry too few active uses to spill into the park; border-vacuum risk is also elevated (100).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high connectivity (76, top decile).

Jacobs reading

York Mills Park sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat — moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • The park is enclosed by buildings (64) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 0) — frame without animation.
  • High connectivity coexists with high border-vacuum risk (100) — much of that connectivity is to highways, rail, or parking lots, not to neighbourhoods.

Typology classification

confidence 85%
Waterfront Parkalso reads as Ravine / Naturalized Park

Classified as Waterfront Park: 8% water surface inside park. Secondary read: Ravine / Naturalized Park (100% ravine overlap, 14% canopy).

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
0.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 10 active uses (transit_stop, retail) and 23 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot, highway, rail). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
75.7 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 18 mapped paths/walkways and 31 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 17 street intersections within 100 m; 34 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 7 estimated access points across ~1,246 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy — no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m18
Intersections within 100 m17
Paths/walkways (50 m)18
Sidewalk segments (50 m)31
Transit stops (400 m)34
Estimated entrances7
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter1.45
Park perimeter1,246 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightinferred 30%
0.0 / 100

No amenities recorded — score is 0 until inventory is loaded.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightmeasured 75%
61.7 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 14.3% estimated tree canopy; 100.0% inside the ravine system; 8.3% water surface; 25 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (5.9/ha). Reading: ravine-cooled. Source coverage: treed_area, ravine, waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage14.3%
Canopy area0.61 ha
Inside ravine system100.0%
Water surface inside park8.3%
Nearest water (if outside park)0 m (inside)
Estimated green91.7%
City-mapped trees inside polygon25
Tree density5.9 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0–100)54.6
Sample points used168

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
64.3 / 100

46 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (6 mid-rise, 40 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 7.6 m (~3 floors); 3.7 buildings per 100 m of 1,246 m perimeter — strong frontage density; edges are low-rise (mostly 2–3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 6 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m46
Buildings within 50 m46
Avg edge height7.6 m (~3 floors)
Tallest edge building25.5 m
Mid-rise (3–7 floors)6
Low-rise (< 3 floors)40
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density3.69 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge13%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter1,246 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
100.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: Miller Tavern Parking, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, York Mills TTC Kiss and Ride, parking_lot, rail, rail, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, Yonge Street. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" — they suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence — read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (0)

No amenities recorded for this park.

Nearby active-edge features (64)

  • transit stop — Old York Mills Rd Entrance0 m
  • rail0 m
  • rail5 m
  • highway — Yonge Street10 m
  • parking lot — York Mills TTC Kiss and Ride11 m
  • highway — Yonge Street12 m
  • highway — Yonge Street24 m
  • transit stop — Yonge St at McGlashan25 m
  • highway — Yonge Street25 m
  • highway — Yonge Street26 m
  • highway — Yonge Street29 m
  • parking lot37 m
  • highway — Yonge Street41 m
  • highway — Yonge Street44 m
  • highway — Yonge Street44 m
  • highway — Yonge Street48 m
  • transit stop — Yonge St at McGlashan49 m
  • transit stop — Wilson Avenue49 m
  • parking lot — Miller Tavern Parking50 m
  • retail — Shell Select54 m
  • parking lot57 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Road63 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Rd at Old York Mills Road70 m
  • rail — Yonge-University-Spadina Line75 m
  • highway — Yonge Street76 m
  • parking lot80 m
  • transit stop — York Mills81 m
  • rail — Yonge-University-Spadina Line82 m
  • transit stop — York Mills83 m
  • parking lot86 m
  • transit stop — Yonge Street91 m
  • rail91 m
  • highway — Yonge Street94 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Rd at Old York Mills Rd102 m
  • highway — Yonge Street105 m
  • highway — Yonge Street106 m
  • transit stop — Mill Street107 m
  • highway — Yonge Street109 m
  • transit stop — Yonge Street111 m
  • highway — Yonge Street117 m
  • transit stop — Yonge Street121 m
  • transit stop — 16 York Mills Entrance122 m
  • highway — Yonge Street128 m
  • restaurant — Druxys135 m
  • transit stop — Yonge St at Wilson Ave137 m
  • transit stop — Yonge Street138 m
  • cafe — Starbucks139 m
  • transit stop — Yonge / Wilson Northwest Entrance143 m
  • highway — Yonge Street148 m
  • highway — Yonge Street151 m
  • highway — Yonge Street153 m
  • restaurant — Mr Souvlaki154 m
  • restaurant — Bento box156 m
  • restaurant — Chicken Quarter157 m
  • highway — Yonge Street166 m
  • cafe — Tim Hortons170 m
  • transit stop — 4025 Yonge Entrance172 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Road179 m
  • transit stop179 m
  • highway — Yonge Street181 m
  • highway — Yonge Street194 m
  • retail — Gateway Newsstands/Public Mobile196 m
  • transit stop199 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Station200 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureYork Mills Park

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    34th
  • Edge activation
    34th
  • Connectivity
    96th
  • Amenity diversity
    41th
  • Natural comfort
    76th
  • Enclosure
    56th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space — useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals — not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of York Mills Parkmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter — and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all · 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only — no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions — a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park — playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden — even small additions raise this score.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

  • City of Toronto Open Data — Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.