Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Staines Road Retention Pond, site photograph
Back to map
Waterfront ParkType:Underperforming / Leftover Space (enclosure-leaning)Morningside Heights

Staines Road Retention Pond

Waterfront Park, middle of the pack overall (score 32, rank ~40th percentile). Strongest: edge activation; weakest: amenity diversity.

No photograph yet. If you have one of Staines Road Retention Pond, we would like to use it.

Submit a photo

Aerial, City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

Data updated

Staines Road Retention Pond scores 32.2 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: amenity diversity (0). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best forwaterfront recreationlong walks

Area · 0.41 ha

Getting around

Paths

No walking paths mapped in OpenStreetMap.

Seating

No seating mapped in OpenStreetMap.

Arrival

Nearest parking 58 m away. None of the 11 nearby lots records whether it has accessible spaces.

Path, seating and parking data comes from OpenStreetMap and reflects what volunteers have mapped, not a survey. Absence here means nobody has recorded it. This section does not assess wheelchair access: the relevant OpenStreetMap tag is present on well under 1% of Toronto paths.

Vitality Score
32/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 59%

Data Confidence
32.2 / 100

Data confidence: moderate

Citywide
40th
of all 3,753 parks
Among Waterfront Park
51st
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
31
median in small Waterfront Park waterfront (n=103)
Performance gap
+2
raw − expected · context confidence high
typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map.

Explain this score

Where did the 32 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation1 · p63
-12.3
Amenity Diversity0 · p24
-10.0
Border Vacuum Risk0 (risk)
+5.0
Enclosure / Eyes on Park62 · p52
+1.2
Natural Comfort42 · p39
-1.2
Connectivity47 · p54
-0.6

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Staines Road Retention Pond works because its edge activation score (1) is middle of the pack.

What limits this park

Staines Road Retention Pond is held back by amenity diversity (0, bottom quartile).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally low amenity diversity (0, bottom quartile).

Jacobs reading

Staines Road Retention Pond sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • The park is enclosed by buildings (62) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 1): frame without animation.

Typology classification

confidence 85%
Waterfront Parkalso reads as Ravine / Naturalized Park

Classified as Waterfront Park: 17% water surface inside park. Secondary read: Ravine / Naturalized Park (100% ravine overlap, 0% canopy).

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
1.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 2 active uses (transit_stop) and 3 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OpenStreetMap: cafes, restaurants, shops, schools, community centres, transit, parking, highways, rail. All data sources.

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
47.0 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 1 mapped paths/walkways and 11 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 5 street intersections within 100 m; 8 bus stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~454 m of perimeter. low edge density, significant superblock penalty applied. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m2
Intersections within 100 m5
Paths/walkways (50 m)1
Sidewalk segments (50 m)11
Transit stops (400 m)8 (0 subway/GO, 0 streetcar/LRT, 8 bus)
Estimated entrances0
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter0.44
Park perimeter454 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops. All data sources.

Amenity Diversity

20% weightinferred 30%
0.0 / 100

No amenities recorded.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags. All data sources.

Natural Comfort

15% weightpartial 45%
41.8 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 0.0% estimated tree canopy; 100.0% inside the ravine system; 17.2% water surface. Reading: ravine-cooled. Source coverage: ravine, waterbodies. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage0.0%
Canopy area0.00 ha
Inside ravine system100.0%
Water surface inside park17.2%
Nearest water (if outside park)0 m (inside)
Estimated green82.8%
City-mapped trees inside polygon0
Tree density0.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)60.2
Sample points used29

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory. All data sources.

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
62.4 / 100

27 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (1 mid-rise, 26 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 6.5 m (~2 floors); 6.0 buildings per 100 m of 454 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are low-rise (mostly 2 to 3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 1 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m27
Buildings within 50 m27
Avg edge height6.5 m (~2 floors)
Tallest edge building9.1 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)1
Low-rise (< 3 floors)26
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density5.95 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge4%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter454 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights). All data sources.

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
0.0 risk

Park edges face the city. No significant border vacuum detected.

Source: OpenStreetMap: highways, rail, parking. All data sources.

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Not loaded yet: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles. All data sources.

Amenities (0)

No amenities recorded for this park.

Nearby active-edge features (26)

  • transit stop: Staines Road at Mantis Road30 m
  • parking lot58 m
  • parking lot77 m
  • parking lot80 m
  • transit stop: Staines Road at Jacques Road92 m
  • rail: Belleville Subdivision104 m
  • rail: Belleville Subdivision111 m
  • parking lot119 m
  • transit stop: Morningside Avenue at Staines Road122 m
  • transit stop: 150 Staines Road West Side130 m
  • rail136 m
  • parking lot136 m
  • parking lot139 m
  • parking lot146 m
  • parking lot147 m
  • rail: Belleville Subdivision150 m
  • parking lot156 m
  • transit stop: Finch Avenue at Morningside Avenue157 m
  • restaurant: Papa John's163 m
  • restaurant: Burger King180 m
  • rail: Belleville Subdivision186 m
  • transit stop: Finch Avenue at Morningside Avenue South Side189 m
  • parking lot190 m
  • transit stop: Morningside Avenue at Finch Avenue192 m
  • transit stop: Staines Road at Knowles Drive197 m
  • parking lot199 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureStaines Road Retention Pond
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    40th
  • Edge activation
    63th
  • Connectivity
    54th
  • Amenity diversity
    24th
  • Natural comfort
    39th
  • Enclosure
    52th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Staines Road Retention Pond matters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Add or open more entrances and improve sidewalk continuity around the park. More permeability means more spontaneous use.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
  • Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Green Spaces
    Polygon boundaries, official names, land classes. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.