Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
St. Andrew'S Playground, site photograph
Back to map
Parkettecluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (large-scale)Waterfront Communities-The Island (77)confidence moderate

St. Andrew'S Playground

Parkette, in the top tier overall (score 51, rank ~94th percentile). Strongest: connectivity; weakest: natural comfort.

Photo by Darcy via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026

St. Andrew'S Playground scores 50.9 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: edge activation (15.4). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best fora quiet siteveryday neighbourhood use

Area · 0.67 ha

What's here

Recreation
PlaygroundOff-leash dog areaGarden
Facilities
Drinking waterPicnic areaBenches
Vitality Score
51/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 68%

Data Confidence
50.9 / 100
Citywide
94th
of all 3,788 parks
Among Parkette
96th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
37
median in small Parkette (n=247)
Performance gap
+14
raw − expected · context confidence high
strong overperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map. Connectivity, transit, and edge conditions read at a glance.
St. Andrew'S Playground, aerial top-down view
Top-down view.City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px. Reads the park’s footprint, paths, treed area, and edge conditions from above. City of Toronto Orthophoto · cot_ortho most-current MapServer · cached 5/9/2026.

Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Explain this score

Where did the 51 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation15 · p74
-8.7
Connectivity79 · p98
+5.8
Enclosure / Eyes on Park87 · p93
+3.7
Border Vacuum Risk24 (risk)
+2.6
Amenity Diversity43 · p94
-1.4
Natural Comfort42 · p40
-1.2

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

St. Andrew'S Playground works because its connectivity score (79) is one of the city's strongest and its amenity diversity (43) is also top decile (26 transit stops sit within a 400 m walk; 22 intersections fall within 100 m of the edge).

What limits this park

.

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high connectivity (79, top decile).

Jacobs reading

St. Andrew'S Playground sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • Connectivity (79) significantly outpaces natural comfort (42): well placed in the city but offers little shade or ecological respite.
  • The park is enclosed by buildings (87) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 15): frame without animation.
  • 12 nearby towers cast wind and shadow without contributing canopy: passive surveillance is plentiful but human-scale comfort is not.

Performance in context

  • This park is a strong overperformer for its cohort: raw 51 versus an expected 37 for similar parks (small Parkette) (gap +14).

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Parkette

Classified as Parkette: small (6682 m²) with strong building frontage (16.8 per 100 m)

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
15.4 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 15 active uses (cafe, restaurant, retail, school) and 7 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
79.2 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 23 mapped paths/walkways and 23 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 22 street intersections within 100 m; 26 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 5 estimated access points across ~339 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m13
Intersections within 100 m22
Paths/walkways (50 m)23
Sidewalk segments (50 m)23
Transit stops (400 m)26
Estimated entrances5
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter3.83
Park perimeter339 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
43.2 / 100

6 distinct amenity types in the park (dog_area, playground, bench, drinking_water, garden, picnic). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightpartial 45%
42.3 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: ~9.1% effective canopy (0.0% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); nearest waterbody ~1121 m; 13 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (13.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage0.0%
Canopy area0.00 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)1,121 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon13
Tree density13.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)0.0
Sample points used47

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
86.6 / 100

57 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (31 mid-rise, 14 low-rise, 12 tower); avg edge height 21.4 m (~7 floors); 16.8 buildings per 100 m of 339 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges lean tall but still framed; 12 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 31 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m57
Buildings within 50 m57
Avg edge height21.4 m (~7 floors)
Tallest edge building54.3 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)31
Low-rise (< 3 floors)14
Towers (≥ 13 floors)12
Frontage density16.81 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge54%
Tower share of edge21%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter339 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
24.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot, parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (6 types · 14 records)

  • dog area
  • playground
  • bench
  • drinking water
  • garden
  • picnic

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • retail: Eva's Print Shop17 m
  • restaurant: Impact20 m
  • retail: Rotblott's Discount Warehouse22 m
  • restaurant: COPS22 m
  • parking lot23 m
  • restaurant: Nutbar30 m
  • parking lot30 m
  • restaurant: nutbar33 m
  • restaurant: Lee Restaurant53 m
  • parking lot57 m
  • restaurant: UNIUN57 m
  • school: Oasis Alternative Secondary School60 m
  • retail: Sobr Market Richmond60 m
  • parking lot61 m
  • retail: Mankind Grooming66 m
  • parking lot68 m
  • retail: Pryntco Toronto69 m
  • parking lot75 m
  • retail: Mankind Grooming77 m
  • parking lot81 m
  • cafe: Fahrenheit Coffee87 m
  • restaurant: Jacobs & Co. Steakhouse97 m
  • cafe: Jimmy's Coffee100 m
  • restaurant: Campechano Taqueria101 m
  • retail: Astley Gilbert103 m
  • cafe: Forget Me Not Cafe106 m
  • retail: Clay With Me112 m
  • parking lot112 m
  • restaurant: Citizen113 m
  • restaurant: Little Sister117 m
  • restaurant: Chubby's Jamaican Kitchen119 m
  • retail132 m
  • restaurant: Shake Shack132 m
  • restaurant: Wilbur Mexicana133 m
  • restaurant: Four Brothers Pizza133 m
  • restaurant: Myth137 m
  • restaurant: Java House138 m
  • restaurant: The Keg139 m
  • restaurant: Craft Kitchen140 m
  • restaurant: Belfast Love Public House140 m
  • restaurant: VELA142 m
  • parking lot143 m
  • parking lot146 m
  • restaurant: Cibo147 m
  • retail: Value Buds147 m
  • retail: Affordable Textiles147 m
  • retail: Arton Beads147 m
  • retail147 m
  • retail147 m
  • retail: World Sew Centre148 m
  • retail: Fresh Picked Fresh Produce & Flowers149 m
  • retail: Mama Loves You Vintage149 m
  • retail: Hi Beads149 m
  • retail: On Your Face Optical149 m
  • restaurant: The Grand149 m
  • retail: The Dot149 m
  • retail149 m
  • retail: Freshly Baked Tees150 m
  • retail: PC Shop Computers150 m
  • retail150 m
  • retail: Comfort Nails150 m
  • restaurant: Greta151 m
  • retail151 m
  • retail: Yes Electric Tattoo154 m
  • retail: Dollarama154 m
  • retail156 m
  • retail: mindzai157 m
  • retail: mim158 m
  • retail: Homebase158 m
  • retail: Backdoor160 m
  • restaurant: Bar Altura160 m
  • retail: The Légère Studio160 m
  • transit stop: Augusta Avenue161 m
  • restaurant: Añejo162 m
  • restaurant: Burrito Boyz162 m
  • retail: Brosche Bridal162 m
  • transit stop: Portland Street163 m
  • retail: Third Floor Tailors164 m
  • transit stop: Augusta Avenue164 m
  • restaurant: Rosie’s Burger164 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureSt. Andrew'S Playground
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    94th
  • Edge activation
    74th
  • Connectivity
    98th
  • Amenity diversity
    94th
  • Natural comfort
    40th
  • Enclosure
    93th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Visitor signals

Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.

high-confidence match

Tree-shaded city park featuring a playground, benches & an off-leash area for dogs. (Google editorial summary)

Visitor signal score66 / 100
65.8 / 100

p87 citywide · p95 within Parkette

Volume (saturated)39
Density / ha83
Rating contribution85
Match dampener×1.00
Average rating
★ 4.4
out of 5
Ratings collected
318
total reviews
Photos uploaded
10
total contributors

Source: Google Places API · match high (1.00 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of St. Andrew'S Playgroundmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
  • Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.