St. Andrew'S Playground
Parkette, in the top tier overall (score 48, rank ~91th percentile). Strongest: connectivity; weakest: natural comfort.
Photo by Darcy via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026
Data updated
St. Andrew'S Playground scores 48.3 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: edge activation (8.7). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (36). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.
Area · 0.67 ha
What's here
Getting around
383 m of mapped path. Too little surface tagging to say how much is paved.
No steps mapped on the path network.
Typically 12 m to the nearest bench, and 37 m at the far end.
Nearest parking 23 m away. None of the 16 nearby lots records whether it has accessible spaces.
Path, seating and parking data comes from OpenStreetMap and reflects what volunteers have mapped, not a survey. Absence here means nobody has recorded it. This section does not assess wheelchair access: the relevant OpenStreetMap tag is present on well under 1% of Toronto paths.
Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 68%
Data confidence: moderate
Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.
Loading map…
The parks map is loading.
Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).
Explain this score
Where did the 48 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.
Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.
Why this park works
St. Andrew'S Playground works because its connectivity score (80) is one of the city's strongest and its amenity diversity (43) is also top decile (14 transit stops sit within a 400 m walk; 22 intersections fall within 100 m of the edge).
What limits this park
St. Andrew'S Playground's edges are fronted by border-vacuum land uses (highways, rail, parking, blank institutional), risk score 36.
Most distinctive characteristic
Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high connectivity (80, top decile).
Jacobs reading
St. Andrew'S Playground sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.
Tradeoffs
- Connectivity (80) significantly outpaces natural comfort (42): well placed in the city but offers little shade or ecological respite.
- The park is enclosed by buildings (87) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 9): frame without animation.
- 12 nearby towers cast wind and shadow without contributing canopy: passive surveillance is plentiful but human-scale comfort is not.
Performance in context
- A modest overperformer for its parkette typology (+11 vs the median in small Parkette).
Typology classification
Classified as Parkette: small (6682 m²) with strong building frontage (16.8 per 100 m)
Edge Activation
Within 100 m of the park edge: 16 active uses (cafe, restaurant, retail, school) and 8 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.
Source: OpenStreetMap: cafes, restaurants, shops, schools, community centres, transit, parking, highways, rail. All data sources.
Connectivity
Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 23 mapped paths/walkways and 23 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 22 street intersections within 100 m; 14 streetcar or LRT stops within a 400 m walk; 5 estimated access points across ~339 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.
Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops. All data sources.
Amenity Diversity
6 distinct amenity types in the park (dog_area, playground, bench, drinking_water, garden, picnic). Diversity drives the score, so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.
Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags. All data sources.
Natural Comfort
Natural-comfort components for this park: ~9.1% effective canopy (0.0% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); nearest waterbody ~1122 m; 13 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (13.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).
Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory. All data sources.
Enclosure / Eyes on Park
57 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (31 mid-rise, 14 low-rise, 12 tower); avg edge height 21.4 m (~7 floors); 16.8 buildings per 100 m of 339 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges lean tall but still framed; 12 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 31 mid-rise edge buildings.
Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights). All data sources.
Border Vacuum Risk
Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.
Source: OpenStreetMap: highways, rail, parking. All data sources.
Equity Context
Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.
Source: Not loaded yet: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles. All data sources.
Amenities (6 types · 16 records)
- dog area
- playground
- bench
- drinking water
- garden
- picnic
Nearby active-edge features (80)
- restaurant: Harry's Charbroiled10 m
- retail: Eva's Print Shop17 m
- restaurant: Impact20 m
- retail: Rotblott's Discount Warehouse22 m
- restaurant: COPS22 m
- parking lot23 m
- parking lot24 m
- restaurant: Nutbar30 m
- parking lot30 m
- restaurant: nutbar33 m
- restaurant: Lee Restaurant53 m
- parking lot57 m
- restaurant: DPRTMNT57 m
- school: Oasis Alternative Secondary School60 m
- retail: Sobr Market Richmond60 m
- parking lot61 m
- retail: Mankind Grooming66 m
- parking lot68 m
- retail: Pryntco Toronto69 m
- parking lot75 m
- retail: Mankind Grooming77 m
- parking lot81 m
- cafe: Fahrenheit Coffee87 m
- restaurant: Jacobs & Co. Steakhouse97 m
- cafe: Jimmy's Coffee100 m
- restaurant: Campechano Taqueria101 m
- retail: Astley Gilbert103 m
- cafe: Forget Me Not Cafe106 m
- retail: Clay With Me112 m
- parking lot112 m
- restaurant: Citizen113 m
- restaurant: Little Sister117 m
- restaurant: Chubby's Jamaican Kitchen119 m
- retail132 m
- restaurant: Shake Shack132 m
- restaurant: Wilbur Mexicana133 m
- restaurant: Four Brothers Pizza133 m
- restaurant: Myth137 m
- restaurant: Java House138 m
- restaurant: Boru138 m
- restaurant: The Keg139 m
- restaurant: Craft Kitchen140 m
- restaurant: Belfast Love Public House140 m
- restaurant: VELA142 m
- parking lot143 m
- parking lot146 m
- restaurant: Cibo147 m
- retail: Value Buds147 m
- retail: Affordable Textiles147 m
- retail: Arton Beads147 m
- retail147 m
- retail147 m
- retail: World Sew Centre148 m
- retail: Fresh Picked Fresh Produce & Flowers149 m
- retail: Mama Loves You Vintage149 m
- retail: Hi Beads149 m
- retail: On Your Face Optical149 m
- restaurant: The Grand149 m
- retail: The Dot149 m
- retail149 m
- retail: Freshly Baked Tees150 m
- retail: PC Shop Computers150 m
- retail150 m
- retail: Comfort Nails150 m
- restaurant: GRETA Bar YYZ151 m
- retail151 m
- retail: Yes Electric Tattoo154 m
- retail: Dollarama154 m
- retail156 m
- retail: mindzai157 m
- retail: mim158 m
- retail: Homebase158 m
- retail: Backdoor160 m
- restaurant: Bar Altura160 m
- retail: The Légère Studio160 m
- transit stop: Augusta Avenue161 m
- restaurant: Añejo162 m
- restaurant: Burrito Boyz162 m
- retail: Brosche Bridal162 m
- transit stop: Portland Street163 m
Park profile
Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.
Citywide percentile ranks
Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.
- Overall vitality91th
- Edge activation67th
- Connectivity99th
- Amenity diversity94th
- Natural comfort40th
- Enclosure93th
Most similar parks
Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.
- Queen'S ParkCorridor / Linear Park41
- West Toronto RailpathCorridor / Linear Park38
- Albert Crosland ParkUrban Plaza38
- Willowdale ParkCorridor / Linear Park42
- Randy Padmore ParkUrban Plaza49
Most opposite parks
Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.
- Trca Lands ( 26)Ravine / Naturalized Park27
- Toronto Islands - Muggs Island ParkRavine / Naturalized Park26
- Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park28
- Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park26
- Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park21
Visitor signals
Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.
“Tree-shaded city park featuring a playground, benches & an off-leash area for dogs.” (Google editorial summary)
p87 citywide · p96 within Parkette
Source: Google Places API · match high (1.00 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.
Human activity signals: not available
No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.
Does this score feel accurate?
Your read of St. Andrew'S Playground matters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.
Tell us how this park feels
We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.
What would improve this park?
Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.
- Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
- Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
- Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.
- Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.
Data sources
- City of Toronto Open Data: Green SpacesPolygon boundaries, official names, land classes. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
- Parks & Recreation FacilitiesInventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
- Toronto Pedestrian NetworkSidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
- Toronto Centreline V2Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
- Toronto 3D MassingBuilding footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
- Toronto Treed AreaTree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
- Toronto Waterbodies & RiversWater surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
- Ravine & Natural Feature ProtectionRavine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
- Toronto Street Tree InventoryTree count + density inside park polygons.
- OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.