Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
East Lynn Park, site photograph
Back to map
Neighbourhood Parkcluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (enclosure-leaning)Woodbine Corridor (64)confidence moderate

East Lynn Park

Neighbourhood Park, in the top tier overall (score 47, rank ~90th percentile). Strongest: amenity diversity; weakest: natural comfort.

Photo by Steven Lamothe via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026

East Lynn Park scores 47.1 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: edge activation (32.2). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (100). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best fordaily urban lifefamilies

Area · 1.17 ha

What's here

Recreation
PlaygroundTennisPoolGardenTable tennis
Facilities
Drinking waterPicnic areaBenches
Vitality Score
47/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 72%

Data Confidence
47.1 / 100
Citywide
90th
of all 3,788 parks
Among Neighbourhood Park
82nd
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
39
median in medium Neighbourhood Park (n=393)
Performance gap
+8
raw − expected · context confidence high
modest overperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map. Connectivity, transit, and edge conditions read at a glance.
East Lynn Park, aerial top-down view
Top-down view.City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px. Reads the park’s footprint, paths, treed area, and edge conditions from above. City of Toronto Orthophoto · cot_ortho most-current MapServer · cached 5/9/2026.

Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Explain this score

Where did the 47 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Border Vacuum Risk100 (risk)
-5.0
Edge Activation32 · p88
-4.4
Connectivity69 · p91
+3.8
Enclosure / Eyes on Park72 · p74
+2.2
Natural Comfort56 · p72
+0.8
Amenity Diversity49 · p97
-0.3

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

East Lynn Park works because its amenity diversity score (49) is one of the city's strongest and its connectivity (69) is also top decile (8 distinct amenity types support different kinds of use).

What limits this park

East Lynn Park's edges are fronted by border-vacuum land uses (highways, rail, parking, blank institutional), risk score 100.

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high amenity diversity (49, top decile).

Jacobs reading

East Lynn Park sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • High connectivity coexists with high border-vacuum risk (100): much of that connectivity is to highways, rail, or parking lots, not to neighbourhoods.

Performance in context

  • A modest overperformer for its neighbourhood park typology (+8 vs the median in medium Neighbourhood Park).

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Neighbourhood Park

Classified as Neighbourhood Park: 1.2 ha, framed by 4 mid-rise vs 0 towers

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
32.2 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 45 active uses (restaurant, transit_stop, retail, cafe) and 7 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot, highway). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
69.1 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 3 mapped paths/walkways and 20 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 15 street intersections within 100 m; 17 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 4 estimated access points across ~543 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m15
Intersections within 100 m15
Paths/walkways (50 m)3
Sidewalk segments (50 m)20
Transit stops (400 m)17
Estimated entrances4
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter2.77
Park perimeter543 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
48.5 / 100

8 distinct amenity types in the park (picnic, playground, tennis, bench, drinking_water, garden, …). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightmeasured 75%
55.5 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: ~21.0% effective canopy (2.4% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); nearest waterbody ~269 m; 35 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (30.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: treed_area, waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage2.4%
Canopy area0.03 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)269 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon35
Tree density30.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)16.2
Sample points used84

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
71.8 / 100

146 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (4 mid-rise, 142 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 6.1 m (~2 floors); 26.9 buildings per 100 m of 543 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are low-rise (mostly 2 to 3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 4 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m146
Buildings within 50 m146
Avg edge height6.1 m (~2 floors)
Tallest edge building9.9 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)4
Low-rise (< 3 floors)142
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density26.91 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge3%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter543 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
100.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: Danforth Avenue, Danforth Avenue, Danforth Avenue, Danforth Avenue. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (8 types · 29 records)

  • picnic
  • playground
  • tennis
  • bench
  • drinking water
  • garden
  • pool
  • table tennis

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • transit stop: East Lynn Avenue2 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue10 m
  • retail: Metro Nails20 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue24 m
  • retail: Universal Diapers27 m
  • retail: Nanda-World Import & Export Trading Co28 m
  • retail: 6Skates28 m
  • cafe: Seb's Cappuccino28 m
  • retail: Ciraco Custom Picture Framers29 m
  • retail: Mississaugas of the Credit Medicine Wheel29 m
  • retail: Celena's Bakery29 m
  • restaurant: Pizza Nova29 m
  • restaurant: The Groove Bar & Grill29 m
  • retail: Fresh 1 Market29 m
  • transit stop: Woodmount Avenue30 m
  • retail: Pellas Studio30 m
  • retail: Wag On The Danforth31 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue32 m
  • cafe: Cafe Cocoro33 m
  • retail: Modern Hair34 m
  • retail: Mary's Brigadeiro36 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue39 m
  • retail: Ace Awards40 m
  • retail: Splash & Shine41 m
  • retail: Marina Travel & Cruise Agency42 m
  • retail: Green Mart44 m
  • restaurant: Carter's Ice Cream44 m
  • retail: Manzer Hair Studio44 m
  • restaurant: The Samosarie45 m
  • retail: Royal Beef48 m
  • retail: Sharmin's Proper Pies51 m
  • retail: 416 H.I.K54 m
  • retail: Danforth Carpet Connection57 m
  • retail: My Sewing Studio58 m
  • cafe: Circus Coffee House60 m
  • retail: Midas63 m
  • cafe: Quattro Amici Cafe64 m
  • retail: The Hardwork Department67 m
  • parking lot68 m
  • retail69 m
  • retail: Wheels & Wings Hobbies73 m
  • retail: Fabric Spark74 m
  • retail: Barbers Lounge78 m
  • retail: 4 Kilo Butcher80 m
  • retail: The Canine Social Company83 m
  • retail: Corso Shoes & Clearence86 m
  • retail: Clean Cuts Barbershop86 m
  • restaurant: Bhojan Ghar89 m
  • retail: Madame Gateaux92 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue93 m
  • restaurant: Tipsy Moose Pub95 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue96 m
  • retail: Wine Rack101 m
  • retail: Little Ones Closet112 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue113 m
  • retail: Moberly Natural Foods115 m
  • transit stop: Glebemount Avenue119 m
  • retail: Taiwan Happy Feet119 m
  • retail: Natural Florist119 m
  • restaurant: Kilt & Harp Pub121 m
  • retail: Dulux Paints121 m
  • retail125 m
  • retail: Zav Coffee Shop & Gallery126 m
  • retail: Expedia Cruises129 m
  • cafe: Fresh Art Studio & Cafe129 m
  • restaurant: Hirut132 m
  • retail: Second Voyage134 m
  • retail: Hastings Barber Shop135 m
  • transit stop: Glebemount Avenue136 m
  • retail: Danforth Bazaar138 m
  • retail: Hollywood Canteen Cinema Shop143 m
  • retail: Silly Goose Kids144 m
  • retail: Prince of Wales Garden & Market144 m
  • retail: Surprise149 m
  • rail151 m
  • retail151 m
  • retail: Sobr Market152 m
  • rail152 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue152 m
  • retail: Danforth Auto Centre155 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureEast Lynn Park
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    90th
  • Edge activation
    88th
  • Connectivity
    91th
  • Amenity diversity
    97th
  • Natural comfort
    72th
  • Enclosure
    74th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Visitor signals

Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.

high-confidence match

Neighborhood park offering a wading pool, picnic area & playground, plus a winter ice rink. (Google editorial summary)

Visitor signal score76 / 100
76.3 / 100

p92 citywide · p90 within Neighbourhood Park

Volume (saturated)60
Density / ha87
Rating contribution88
Match dampener×1.00
Average rating
★ 4.5
out of 5
Ratings collected
755
total reviews
Photos uploaded
10
total contributors

Source: Google Places API · match high (0.99 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of East Lynn Parkmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.