Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Village Of Yorkville Park, site photograph
Back to map
Urban PlazaType:Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Park (enclosure-leaning)Annex

Village Of Yorkville Park

Urban Plaza, above average overall (score 45, rank ~85th percentile). Strongest: edge activation; weakest: natural comfort.

Photo by Domenico via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026

Data updated

Village Of Yorkville Park scores 44.7 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: amenity diversity (1.4). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (36). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best fordaily passing-throughpocket meetings

Area · 0.33 ha

Getting around

Paths

50 m of mapped path. Too little surface tagging to say how much is paved.

Too little path mapped to check for steps.

Seating

No seating mapped in OpenStreetMap.

Arrival

Nearest parking 58 m away. None of the 2 nearby lots records whether it has accessible spaces.

Path, seating and parking data comes from OpenStreetMap and reflects what volunteers have mapped, not a survey. Absence here means nobody has recorded it. This section does not assess wheelchair access: the relevant OpenStreetMap tag is present on well under 1% of Toronto paths.

Vitality Score
45/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 63%

Data Confidence
44.7 / 100

Data confidence: moderate

Citywide
85th
of all 3,753 parks
Among Urban Plaza
73rd
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
42
median in small Urban Plaza (n=107)
Performance gap
+3
raw − expected · context confidence high
typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map. Connectivity, transit, and edge conditions read at a glance.
Village Of Yorkville Park, aerial top-down view
Top-down view. City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px. Reads the park’s footprint, paths, treed area, and edge conditions from above. City of Toronto Orthophoto · cot_ortho most-current MapServer · cached 5/9/2026.

Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Near the park

Numbers match the pins on the map. Works near the park are within 30 m of its edge.

Explain this score

Where did the 45 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Amenity Diversity1 · p51
-9.7
Enclosure / Eyes on Park85 · p91
+3.5
Connectivity59 · p75
+1.9
Natural Comfort38 · p32
-1.8
Border Vacuum Risk36 (risk)
+1.4
Edge Activation48 · p95
-0.6

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Village Of Yorkville Park works because its edge activation score (48) is one of the city's strongest and its enclosure (85) is also top decile.

What limits this park

Village Of Yorkville Park is held back by natural comfort (38, below-average): only 4% canopy means little summer shade; border-vacuum risk is also elevated (36).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high edge activation (48, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Village Of Yorkville Park sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • 27 nearby towers cast wind and shadow without contributing canopy: passive surveillance is plentiful but human-scale comfort is not.

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Urban Plaza

Classified as Urban Plaza: 3314 m², paved (4% canopy), 35.0 buildings/100 m

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
47.7 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 133 active uses (transit_stop, retail, restaurant, cafe) and 6 dead/hostile uses (rail, highway, parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OpenStreetMap: cafes, restaurants, shops, schools, community centres, transit, parking, highways, rail. All data sources.

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
59.3 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 0 mapped paths/walkways and 14 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 11 street intersections within 100 m; 3 subway or GO stations, 14 bus stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~332 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m8
Intersections within 100 m11
Paths/walkways (50 m)0
Sidewalk segments (50 m)14
Transit stops (400 m)17 (3 subway/GO, 0 streetcar/LRT, 14 bus)
Estimated entrances0
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter2.41
Park perimeter332 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops. All data sources.

Amenity Diversity

20% weightinferred 30%
1.4 / 100

No amenities recorded. 1 public artwork near the park adds a bonus for the number of works.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags. All data sources.

Natural Comfort

15% weightmeasured 75%
38.1 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 4.0% estimated tree canopy; nearest waterbody ~1489 m; 1 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (1.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: treed_area, waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage4.0%
Canopy area0.01 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)1,489 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon1
Tree density1.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)24.2
Sample points used25

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory. All data sources.

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
84.8 / 100

116 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (60 mid-rise, 29 low-rise, 27 tower); avg edge height 26.4 m (~9 floors); 35.0 buildings per 100 m of 332 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges lean tall but still framed; 27 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 60 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m116
Buildings within 50 m116
Avg edge height26.4 m (~9 floors)
Tallest edge building94.3 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)60
Low-rise (< 3 floors)29
Towers (≥ 13 floors)27
Frontage density34.97 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge52%
Tower share of edge23%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter332 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights). All data sources.

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
36.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: Line 2 Bloor-Danforth, Line 2 Bloor-Danforth. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: OpenStreetMap: highways, rail, parking. All data sources.

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Not loaded yet: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles. All data sources.

Amenities (0)

No amenities recorded for this park.

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • transit stop: Cumberland Street0 m
  • restaurant: Nut Bar8 m
  • restaurant: Lili9 m
  • cafe: Sorry Coffee Co.10 m
  • restaurant: Kupfert and Kim10 m
  • cafe: Starbucks14 m
  • restaurant: Mandy’s14 m
  • retail: La Canadienne, Boutique Yorkville15 m
  • restaurant: Dimmi Bar & Trattoria15 m
  • restaurant: Hemingway's Restaurant and Bar15 m
  • transit stop: Bellair Street15 m
  • retail: Avec Plaisir15 m
  • restaurant: BBQ Express15 m
  • retail: The Papery16 m
  • retail: Lululemon16 m
  • retail: ERES16 m
  • retail: QR Vape16 m
  • retail: Watchfinder17 m
  • restaurant: sassafraz17 m
  • retail: Blo Blow Dry Bar17 m
  • retail17 m
  • restaurant: Sushi Inn Japanese Restaurant17 m
  • retail17 m
  • retail: Utopia17 m
  • cafe: Goldstruck Freshly Roasted Coffee17 m
  • cafe: Carole's Cheesecake Café17 m
  • retail: World Eyewear18 m
  • retail: Bellair Coffee Plus Convenience18 m
  • retail: Wolford18 m
  • retail18 m
  • retail: Vision Care18 m
  • retail: The Ordinary19 m
  • retail: Liss Gallery19 m
  • retail19 m
  • retail: Damasci Fine Jewellery Artisans19 m
  • retail: Carry Maternity19 m
  • retail: Seefu Hair Salon20 m
  • retail: Manimuse Hair Studio20 m
  • retail: Amadeus Patisserie20 m
  • restaurant: Jacques Bistro du Parc20 m
  • retail: Holly20 m
  • retail: Rock ‘N Karma20 m
  • retail: K Nails & Spa21 m
  • retail: Amani Hair, Skin Care21 m
  • retail: Anthony Passero Salon21 m
  • retail: New Happy Feet Spa21 m
  • retail: Golden Beauty Dry Bar23 m
  • retail: Salon Bespoke23 m
  • retail: Raffaelo23 m
  • retail: Nicolas25 m
  • retail: Tokyo Smoke26 m
  • restaurant: Pala 148 Roman Style Pizza28 m
  • retail: Salvati30 m
  • retail: Harry Rosen31 m
  • retail: Aveda33 m
  • retail: Swiss Gallery36 m
  • rail: Line 2 Bloor-Danforth37 m
  • retail: Ritchie's Estate Jewellery40 m
  • retail: ça va de soi - Toronto40 m
  • retail: Lululemon41 m
  • retail: Stavros42 m
  • restaurant: Yamato44 m
  • restaurant: ms|sm45 m
  • retail: The Cashmere Shop46 m
  • rail: Line 2 Bloor-Danforth46 m
  • retail: Laywine's48 m
  • retail: Burberry48 m
  • restaurant: 156 OneFiveSix48 m
  • transit stop: Bay50 m
  • retail: HomeSense50 m
  • retail: Winners51 m
  • retail: Kumari's52 m
  • transit stop: Bay53 m
  • retail: Van Cleef & Arpels53 m
  • retail: Alexander Wang53 m
  • retail: Saint Laurent53 m
  • retail: Paris Baguette53 m
  • retail: L'Occitane54 m
  • retail: Eleventy54 m
  • retail: Hermès54 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureVillage Of Yorkville Park
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    85th
  • Edge activation
    95th
  • Connectivity
    75th
  • Amenity diversity
    51th
  • Natural comfort
    32th
  • Enclosure
    91th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Visitor signals

Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.

high-confidence match

“Upscale shops & restaurants surround this small open space & events site with a fountain.” (Google editorial summary)

Visitor signal score88 / 100
87.9 / 100

p98 citywide · p100 within Urban Plaza

Volume (saturated)80
Density / ha98
Rating contribution88
Match dampener×1.00
Average rating
★ 4.5
out of 5
Ratings collected
2,039
total reviews
Photos uploaded
10
total contributors

Source: Google Places API · match high (1.00 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Village Of Yorkville Park matters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
  • Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Green Spaces
    Polygon boundaries, official names, land classes. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.