Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Mccaul - Orde Parkette — site photograph
Back to map
Urban Plazacluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (enclosure-leaning)Kensington-Chinatown (78)confidence moderatereal Toronto data

Mccaul - Orde Parkette

Urban Plaza, middle of the pack overall (score 34, rank ~50th percentile). Strongest: enclosure; weakest: natural comfort.

Aerial — City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

Mccaul - Orde Parkette scores 34.1 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: amenity diversity (0). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (36). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors — not a definitive judgment.

Best for:daily passing-throughpocket meetings

Area · 0.28 ha

Vitality Score
34/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 56%

Data Confidence
34.1 / 100
Citywide
50th
of all 3,273 parks
Among Urban Plaza
35th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
39
median in small Urban Plaza (n=100)
Performance gap
-5
raw − expected · context confidence high
typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Explain this score

Where did the 34 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation0 · p40
-12.5
Amenity Diversity0 · p46
-10.0
Enclosure / Eyes on Park95 · p99
+4.5
Connectivity68 · p87
+3.6
Natural Comfort31 · p14
-2.8
Border Vacuum Risk36 (risk)
+1.4

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Mccaul - Orde Parkette works because its enclosure score (95) is one of the city's strongest and its connectivity (68) is also top quartile (34 mid-rise buildings frame the edge with passive surveillance).

What limits this park

Mccaul - Orde Parkette is held back by natural comfort (31, bottom quartile)— only 0% canopy means little summer shade; border-vacuum risk is also elevated (36).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high enclosure (95, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Mccaul - Orde Parkette sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat — moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • Connectivity (68) significantly outpaces natural comfort (31) — well placed in the city but offers little shade or ecological respite.
  • The park is enclosed by buildings (95) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 0) — frame without animation.

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Urban Plaza

Classified as Urban Plaza: 2764 m², paved (0% canopy), 28.0 buildings/100 m

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
0.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 0 active uses (none) and 8 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
67.8 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 4 mapped paths/walkways and 8 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 13 street intersections within 100 m; 29 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 4 estimated access points across ~229 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy — no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m9
Intersections within 100 m13
Paths/walkways (50 m)4
Sidewalk segments (50 m)8
Transit stops (400 m)29
Estimated entrances4
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter3.94
Park perimeter229 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightinferred 30%
0.0 / 100

No amenities recorded — score is 0 until inventory is loaded.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightinferred 24%
31.1 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 0.0% estimated tree canopy; 1 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (1.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage0.0%
Canopy area0.00 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)1,500 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon1
Tree density1.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0–100)0.0
Sample points used20

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
94.8 / 100

64 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (34 mid-rise, 26 low-rise, 4 tower); avg edge height 16.1 m (~5 floors); 28.0 buildings per 100 m of 229 m perimeter — strong frontage density; edges are at a Jacobs-scale walkable mid-rise (3–7 floors); 4 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 34 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m64
Buildings within 50 m64
Avg edge height16.1 m (~5 floors)
Tallest edge building67.8 m
Mid-rise (3–7 floors)34
Low-rise (< 3 floors)26
Towers (≥ 13 floors)4
Frontage density27.99 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge53%
Tower share of edge6%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter229 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
36.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" — they suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence — read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (0)

No amenities recorded for this park.

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • parking lot17 m
  • parking lot26 m
  • parking lot50 m
  • parking lot69 m
  • parking lot72 m
  • parking lot73 m
  • parking lot75 m
  • parking lot96 m
  • parking lot102 m
  • restaurant — Druxy's Famous Deli104 m
  • parking lot116 m
  • restaurant — Margarita's Mexican Fiesta118 m
  • retail — Baldwin Naturals Health Food Store121 m
  • parking lot125 m
  • parking lot128 m
  • restaurant — Street Grill Bar129 m
  • parking lot130 m
  • restaurant — St. Louis Bar & Grill133 m
  • restaurant — Omai134 m
  • restaurant — Dakshin135 m
  • cafe — Butter & Blue137 m
  • cafe — On the Way Café138 m
  • retail — Cubeshops139 m
  • restaurant — Smith Social House139 m
  • restaurant — Cafe la Gaffe140 m
  • restaurant — Manchu Wok140 m
  • restaurant — Subway141 m
  • restaurant — Meet You142 m
  • retail — Hattendo143 m
  • restaurant — The Poke Box143 m
  • cafe — Rooms143 m
  • restaurant — Mexhico145 m
  • cafe — Second Cup145 m
  • transit stop — McCaul Street147 m
  • restaurant — Valens147 m
  • transit stop — McCaul Street147 m
  • restaurant — Lala Spicy Lab148 m
  • cafe — Tim Hortons150 m
  • restaurant — Dong Dong BBQ Meat Bibimibap150 m
  • retail152 m
  • restaurant — Light café153 m
  • restaurant — Dear Saigon155 m
  • retail — Indigo155 m
  • retail — Streetcvlture157 m
  • retail — INS Market158 m
  • restaurant — Fat Bastard Burrito160 m
  • retail — Mode Line160 m
  • retail — Medical Canada160 m
  • restaurant — Charidise161 m
  • retail — Ginkgo Floral Design162 m
  • restaurant — Smoque N' Bones162 m
  • restaurant — Taisho Japanese Grill162 m
  • retail — Mansueta Medical Garment Fitters163 m
  • retail — La Fete163 m
  • restaurant — Midi164 m
  • restaurant — Soya Peking Duck165 m
  • cafe — Tim Hortons173 m
  • restaurant — Koh Lipe174 m
  • restaurant — Bread & Bowl175 m
  • cafe — Jimmy's Coffee175 m
  • cafe — Second Cup176 m
  • cafe — Carbonic Coffee176 m
  • retail — Alfies177 m
  • restaurant — Swiss Chalet178 m
  • retail178 m
  • restaurant — Ronin Izakaya181 m
  • retail — Garry's Shoe Repair182 m
  • restaurant — Krispy Kreme183 m
  • retail — Last Gen Toronto185 m
  • cafe — The Sweet Spot185 m
  • retail185 m
  • parking lot185 m
  • restaurant — Yunnan Noodle Shack188 m
  • restaurant — Neon Hotpot189 m
  • restaurant — Subway190 m
  • transit stop — University Ave at Gerrard St West191 m
  • cafe — Timothy's192 m
  • restaurant — Larb Muang192 m
  • restaurant — Tiger Den193 m
  • restaurant — Dahu Hotpot193 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureMccaul - Orde Parkette

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    50th
  • Edge activation
    40th
  • Connectivity
    87th
  • Amenity diversity
    46th
  • Natural comfort
    14th
  • Enclosure
    99th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space — useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals — not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Mccaul - Orde Parkettematters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter — and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all · 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only — no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions — a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park — playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden — even small additions raise this score.
  • Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

  • City of Toronto Open Data — Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.