Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
MACKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds — site photograph
Back to map
Urban Plazacluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (enclosure-leaning)Church-Yonge Corridor (75)confidence moderatereal Toronto data

MACKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds

Urban Plaza, above average overall (score 41, rank ~79th percentile). Strongest: edge activation; weakest: natural comfort.

Aerial — City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

MACKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds scores 40.9 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and edge activation. Weakest: amenity diversity (0). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (36). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors — not a definitive judgment.

Best for:daily passing-throughpocket meetings

Area · 0.06 ha

Vitality Score
41/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 56%

Data Confidence
40.9 / 100
Citywide
79th
of all 3,273 parks
Among Urban Plaza
70th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
36
median in pocket Urban Plaza (n=337)
Performance gap
+5
raw − expected · context confidence high
typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Explain this score

Where did the 41 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Amenity Diversity0 · p30
-10.0
Enclosure / Eyes on Park88 · p94
+3.8
Natural Comfort31 · p14
-2.8
Connectivity42 · p39
-1.6
Border Vacuum Risk36 (risk)
+1.4
Edge Activation50 · p96
+0.1

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

MACKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds works because its edge activation score (50) is one of the city's strongest and its enclosure (88) is also top decile (its perimeter is lined with active uses).

What limits this park

MACKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds is held back by natural comfort (31, bottom quartile)— only 0% canopy means little summer shade; border-vacuum risk is also elevated (36).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high edge activation (50, top decile).

Jacobs reading

MACKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat — moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • 19 nearby towers cast wind and shadow without contributing canopy — passive surveillance is plentiful but human-scale comfort is not.

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Urban Plaza

Classified as Urban Plaza: 556 m², paved (0% canopy), 77.2 buildings/100 m

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
50.4 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 28 active uses (restaurant, retail, transit_stop, community, cafe) and 4 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
42.1 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 0 mapped paths/walkways and 7 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 8 street intersections within 100 m; 41 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~102 m of perimeter. low edge density — significant superblock penalty applied. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m0
Intersections within 100 m8
Paths/walkways (50 m)0
Sidewalk segments (50 m)7
Transit stops (400 m)41
Estimated entrances0
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter0.00
Park perimeter102 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightinferred 30%
0.0 / 100

No amenities recorded — score is 0 until inventory is loaded.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightinferred 24%
31.1 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 0.0% estimated tree canopy; 1 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (1.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage0.0%
Canopy area0.00 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)1,500 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon1
Tree density1.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0–100)0.0
Sample points used15

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
87.8 / 100

79 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (44 mid-rise, 16 low-rise, 19 tower); avg edge height 24.9 m (~8 floors); 77.2 buildings per 100 m of 102 m perimeter — strong frontage density; edges lean tall but still framed; 19 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 44 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m79
Buildings within 50 m79
Avg edge height24.9 m (~8 floors)
Tallest edge building122.0 m
Mid-rise (3–7 floors)44
Low-rise (< 3 floors)16
Towers (≥ 13 floors)19
Frontage density77.20 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge56%
Tower share of edge24%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter102 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
36.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" — they suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence — read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (0)

No amenities recorded for this park.

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • parking lot4 m
  • parking lot24 m
  • restaurant — PomAnar Grill & Juicery28 m
  • retail — Hakim Optical34 m
  • restaurant — Jazz Bistro34 m
  • retail — Hakim Optical Factory Outlet35 m
  • retail — Butterfield and Robinson Travel36 m
  • parking lot40 m
  • restaurant — Senator Restaurant41 m
  • restaurant — The Senator Restaurant42 m
  • retail — Discount Textbooks58 m
  • parking lot59 m
  • restaurant — Burrito Boyz61 m
  • retail — Paramusic Records61 m
  • retail — Victoria Copy & Printing61 m
  • retail — Rock Da House Barbershop67 m
  • cafe — Twilight Cafe67 m
  • community — Toronto Met Catholics68 m
  • restaurant — Subway72 m
  • restaurant — Hokkaido Ramen Santouka76 m
  • retail — Jewellery & Diamond Center76 m
  • retail79 m
  • restaurant81 m
  • retail83 m
  • retail85 m
  • restaurant — Egg Club86 m
  • retail88 m
  • restaurant — KFC89 m
  • retail — Digital Xpress90 m
  • transit stop — Church Street91 m
  • retail — Classic Nails & Spa94 m
  • restaurant — Taco Bell99 m
  • retail — Notebook Depot101 m
  • restaurant — Subway107 m
  • cafe — Starbucks110 m
  • retail — INS Market114 m
  • restaurant — Tahini's121 m
  • restaurant — Martini Bar122 m
  • restaurant — Odd Burger124 m
  • restaurant — Krispy Kreme127 m
  • transit stop — Church Street131 m
  • restaurant — Fran's Restaurant136 m
  • restaurant — Jack Astor's137 m
  • restaurant — Paramount Middle Eastern Cuisine and Bakery138 m
  • restaurant — Khazana139 m
  • restaurant — Asian Bowl140 m
  • retail — Downtown Jewellery Mart140 m
  • restaurant — Kanpai Snack Bar140 m
  • retail — Spellbound Salon140 m
  • restaurant — Popeyes140 m
  • retail — EB Games140 m
  • restaurant — 3 Brewers140 m
  • parking lot144 m
  • retail — Hop on-hop off Toronto bus tours tickets and first stop145 m
  • restaurant — Alpha’s Shawarma145 m
  • restaurant — Burger King147 m
  • retail — Money Mart150 m
  • cafe — Tim Hortons152 m
  • highway — Yonge Street153 m
  • restaurant — Delhi Momos153 m
  • restaurant — Chachu's153 m
  • retail — Stag Shop155 m
  • transit stop — Sankofa Square Elevator161 m
  • transit stop — Sankofa Square Entrance163 m
  • retail — Henry's167 m
  • transit stop — Toronto Eaton Centre168 m
  • restaurant — Jack Astor's172 m
  • restaurant — Spring Sushi172 m
  • retail — Urban Outfitters174 m
  • highway — Yonge Street174 m
  • restaurant — Fast Fresh Foods175 m
  • restaurant — Szechuan Express175 m
  • cafe — Starbucks176 m
  • restaurant — Akashiro176 m
  • highway — Yonge Street176 m
  • restaurant — Sbarro176 m
  • retail — Dundas Market176 m
  • transit stop — Dundas Street179 m
  • restaurant — Kabul Express Authentic Afghan Grill180 m
  • restaurant — Milestones180 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureMACKENZIE HOUSE - Building Grounds

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    79th
  • Edge activation
    96th
  • Connectivity
    39th
  • Amenity diversity
    30th
  • Natural comfort
    14th
  • Enclosure
    94th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space — useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals — not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of MACKENZIE HOUSE - Building Groundsmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter — and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all · 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only — no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions — a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Add or open more entrances and improve sidewalk continuity around the park. More permeability means more spontaneous use.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park — playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden — even small additions raise this score.
  • Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

  • City of Toronto Open Data — Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.