Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Broadview Subway Station Parkette, site photograph
Back to map
Urban Plazacluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (large-scale)Playter Estates-Danforth (67)confidence moderate

Broadview Subway Station Parkette

Urban Plaza, middle of the pack overall (score 37, rank ~62th percentile). Strongest: enclosure; weakest: edge activation.

Aerial, City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

Broadview Subway Station Parkette scores 37.4 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: edge activation (0). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (48). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best fordaily passing-throughpocket meetings

Area · 0.12 ha

What's here

Recreation
Garden
Facilities
Benches
Vitality Score
37/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 66%

Data Confidence
37.4 / 100
Citywide
62nd
of all 3,788 parks
Among Urban Plaza
44th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
38
median in pocket Urban Plaza (n=360)
Performance gap
-0
raw − expected · context confidence high
typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map.

Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Explain this score

Where did the 37 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation0 · p24
-12.5
Amenity Diversity21 · p70
-5.8
Connectivity68 · p90
+3.6
Enclosure / Eyes on Park86 · p93
+3.6
Natural Comfort38 · p32
-1.8
Border Vacuum Risk48 (risk)
+0.2

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Broadview Subway Station Parkette works because its enclosure score (86) is in the top tier and its connectivity (68) is also top quartile (12 mid-rise buildings frame the edge with passive surveillance).

What limits this park

Broadview Subway Station Parkette is held back by edge activation (0, bottom quartile): the surrounding streets carry too few active uses to spill into the park; border-vacuum risk is also elevated (48).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high enclosure (86, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Broadview Subway Station Parkette sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

  • Connectivity (68) significantly outpaces natural comfort (38): well placed in the city but offers little shade or ecological respite.
  • The park is enclosed by buildings (86) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 0): frame without animation.

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Urban Plaza

Classified as Urban Plaza: 1151 m², paved (0% canopy), 41.1 buildings/100 m

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
0.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 32 active uses (retail, transit_stop, restaurant) and 13 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot, rail, highway). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
68.2 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 6 mapped paths/walkways and 10 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 8 street intersections within 100 m; 26 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 3 estimated access points across ~151 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m7
Intersections within 100 m8
Paths/walkways (50 m)6
Sidewalk segments (50 m)10
Transit stops (400 m)26
Estimated entrances3
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter4.64
Park perimeter151 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
21.0 / 100

2 distinct amenity types in the park (bench, garden). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightinferred 36%
38.3 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: ~3.5% effective canopy (0.0% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); nearest waterbody ~397 m; 5 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (5.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage0.0%
Canopy area0.00 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)397 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon5
Tree density5.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)0.0
Sample points used14

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
86.4 / 100

62 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (12 mid-rise, 50 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 7.5 m (~3 floors); 41.1 buildings per 100 m of 151 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are low-rise (mostly 2 to 3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 12 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m62
Buildings within 50 m62
Avg edge height7.5 m (~3 floors)
Tallest edge building18.0 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)12
Low-rise (< 3 floors)50
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density41.09 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge19%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter151 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
48.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot, Line 2 Bloor-Danforth, Line 2 Bloor-Danforth. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (2 types · 4 records)

  • bench
  • garden

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • transit stop: Broadview Station2 m
  • transit stop: Erindale Avenue2 m
  • transit stop: Broadview Station3 m
  • transit stop: Broadview Station12 m
  • transit stop: Broadview Station22 m
  • restaurant: Ryus Noodle Bar23 m
  • transit stop: Broadview Station25 m
  • transit stop: Broadview Station29 m
  • parking lot30 m
  • transit stop: Broadview Avenue32 m
  • transit stop: Broadview Station33 m
  • retail: Detalles Gift Shop35 m
  • transit stop: Broadview Station36 m
  • transit stop: Broadview46 m
  • rail: Line 2 Bloor-Danforth46 m
  • rail: Line 2 Bloor-Danforth49 m
  • transit stop: Broadview49 m
  • parking lot56 m
  • rail: Line 2 Bloor-Danforth60 m
  • rail: Line 2 Bloor-Danforth63 m
  • restaurant: ImPerfect Fresh Eats66 m
  • restaurant: PiCo67 m
  • parking lot68 m
  • restaurant: Pizzaiolo68 m
  • restaurant: Burger King68 m
  • parking lot70 m
  • transit stop: Danforth Avenue71 m
  • restaurant: Khayal Shawarma73 m
  • transit stop: Broadview Avenue74 m
  • transit stop: Danforth Avenue75 m
  • retail: La Di Da Boutique75 m
  • parking lot78 m
  • retail: Farmer Fruit Market80 m
  • retail: Midoco82 m
  • parking lot82 m
  • retail: Small Wanders Pets83 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue83 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue84 m
  • restaurant: Black Swan Tavern85 m
  • parking lot89 m
  • retail: COBS Bread89 m
  • retail: Paul's Milk89 m
  • restaurant: Azura92 m
  • retail: Massage Addict95 m
  • retail: Northern International Travel97 m
  • restaurant: Tapas at Embrujo100 m
  • restaurant: Rodeo101 m
  • retail: Dollar Basic Super Discount101 m
  • rail101 m
  • restaurant: The Edmund Burke102 m
  • cafe: Tim Hortons103 m
  • restaurant: Ali Baba's105 m
  • retail: M Nails106 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue106 m
  • transit stop: Broadview Avenue110 m
  • cafe: Epochal Imp110 m
  • restaurant: Broadview Diner111 m
  • retail: Sutherland-Chan Clinic112 m
  • retail: Global Pet Foods114 m
  • restaurant: The Caribbean Dutchpot116 m
  • retail: Foot Sensation116 m
  • restaurant: Noonan's Pub119 m
  • restaurant: Off the Hook120 m
  • restaurant: Allen's121 m
  • cafe: Broadview Espresso122 m
  • transit stop: Pretoria Avenue124 m
  • retail: Noon’s Fine Foods125 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue126 m
  • retail: Der Dietemann127 m
  • retail: Broadview Nails & Spa131 m
  • highway: Danforth Avenue132 m
  • retail: Sheila's Shear Art132 m
  • restaurant: Sidebar134 m
  • restaurant: Si Espresso Bar136 m
  • retail: Riverdale Cleaners - Professional Wet Cleaning and Valet139 m
  • parking lot139 m
  • cafe: Si Espresso Coffee142 m
  • retail: Foot & Orthotics142 m
  • retail: Dough Bakeshop145 m
  • retail: Fresh Floral Creations153 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureBroadview Subway Station Parkette
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    62th
  • Edge activation
    24th
  • Connectivity
    90th
  • Amenity diversity
    70th
  • Natural comfort
    32th
  • Enclosure
    93th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Broadview Subway Station Parkettematters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
  • Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.