Urban Plazacluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (large-scale)Junction Area (90)confidence moderate

Vine Avenue Playground

Urban Plaza, middle of the pack overall (score 39, rank ~67th percentile). Strongest: amenity diversity; weakest: natural comfort.

Aerial, City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

Vine Avenue Playground scores 38.6 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: edge activation (0). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (30). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best fordaily passing-throughpocket meetings

Area · 0.53 ha

What's here

Recreation

PlaygroundBasketball

Facilities

Drinking waterPicnic areaShelterBenches

Vitality Score

39/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 68%

Data Confidence

38.6 / 100

Citywide

67th

of all 3,788 parks

Among Urban Plaza

49th

same primary typology

Expected for similar parks

median in small Urban Plaza (n=115)

Performance gap

-3

raw − expected · context confidence high

typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map.

Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Explain this score

Where did the 39 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON

What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score

Edge Activation0 · p39

-12.5

Enclosure / Eyes on Park80 · p84

+3.0

Border Vacuum Risk30 (risk)

+2.0

Natural Comfort39 · p34

-1.6

Amenity Diversity42 · p93

-1.6

Connectivity47 · p53

-0.7

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Vine Avenue Playground works because its amenity diversity score (42) is in the top tier and its enclosure (80) is also top quartile (6 distinct amenity types support different kinds of use).

What limits this park

Vine Avenue Playground is held back by natural comfort (39, below-average): only 0% canopy means little summer shade; border-vacuum risk is also elevated (30).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high amenity diversity (42, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Vine Avenue Playground sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Tradeoffs

The park is enclosed by buildings (80) but the surrounding streets are quiet (edge activation 0): frame without animation.

Typology classification

confidence 70%

Urban Plaza

Classified as Urban Plaza: 5334 m², paved (0% canopy), 11.9 buildings/100 m

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%

0.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 0 active uses (none) and 2 dead/hostile uses (rail, parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%

46.7 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 0 mapped paths/walkways and 5 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 8 street intersections within 100 m; 15 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~303 m of perimeter. moderate edge density, small superblock penalty applied. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m3

Intersections within 100 m8

Paths/walkways (50 m)0

Sidewalk segments (50 m)5

Transit stops (400 m)15

Estimated entrances0

Edge connections / 100 m perimeter0.99

Park perimeter303 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%

42.0 / 100

6 distinct amenity types in the park (basketball, playground, bench, drinking_water, picnic, shelter). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightpartial 45%

39.1 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: ~5.6% effective canopy (0.0% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); nearest waterbody ~974 m; 8 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (8.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage0.0%

Canopy area0.00 ha

Inside ravine system0.0%

Water surface inside park0.0%

Nearest water (if outside park)974 m

Estimated green100.0%

City-mapped trees inside polygon8

Tree density8.0 / ha

Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)0.0

Sample points used41

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%

79.8 / 100

36 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (8 mid-rise, 28 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 7.9 m (~3 floors); 11.9 buildings per 100 m of 303 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are low-rise (mostly 2 to 3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 8 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m36

Buildings within 50 m36

Avg edge height7.9 m (~3 floors)

Tallest edge building15.9 m

Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)8

Low-rise (< 3 floors)28

Towers (≥ 13 floors)0

Frontage density11.87 per 100 m perimeter

Mid-rise share of edge22%

Tower share of edge0%

Blank-edge share (proxy)0%

Park perimeter303 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%

30.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: rail, parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%

50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (6 types · 16 records)

basketball
playground
bench
drinking water
picnic
shelter

Nearby active-edge features (80)

parking lot25 m
rail33 m
retail: The Sweet Potato116 m
retail: The Art of Demolition118 m
rail118 m
restaurant: Axis119 m
restaurant: 3030120 m
retail122 m
retail: Hair Embu122 m
cafe: Gigli Caffe122 m
retail122 m
restaurant: Gabby's122 m
retail: Delight Chocolate122 m
restaurant: Curry Twist123 m
restaurant: Lebanon Express123 m
retail: Character123 m
retail: Satisfaction Spa and Skin Therapy123 m
restaurant: The Friendly Thai123 m
retail: Latre Art + Style124 m
retail: T’s Top notch124 m
cafe: Noctua Bakery125 m
retail: Pretty Clean Shop126 m
retail: Chuckleberry Emporium127 m
retail: Optimum Natural Foods128 m
retail: Sweet Trolley Bakery128 m
retail: American Electronics129 m
retail129 m
restaurant: Chiang Mai130 m
retail: The Bkry Cannabis131 m
retail134 m
restaurant: North of Bombay134 m
retail: Polish’d Nail Lounge136 m
retail: Old Fashioned Restoration140 m
restaurant: Dirty Food Eatery142 m
retail142 m
restaurant: Bevi Birra144 m
restaurant: Kanto by Tita Flips145 m
restaurant: In The Junction Caribbean Cuisine147 m
restaurant: Tino’s147 m
transit stop: Quebec Avenue148 m
retail: Padaria Toronto149 m
restaurant: Domino's149 m
retail: Gossips Hairstylists Inc.149 m
retail: Stari Grad149 m
retail: The Soil Sanctuary149 m
retail: Treasures150 m
retail: Solero Medditerranean Bakery150 m
retail: Ladybug Pet Boutique150 m
retail: Lucy Nails151 m
restaurant: Carmelitas151 m
cafe: UB Social152 m
restaurant: Pizza Cantina153 m
retail: Maker's Market154 m
retail: Picture It Framed156 m
retail: Arts Market157 m
retail: Tailwaggers157 m
retail: Eclectic Revival159 m
retail: Ren's Pets161 m
retail161 m
retail: Petti Fine Foods163 m
transit stop: Dundas Street West163 m
restaurant: Venga Cucina164 m
retail: Take Note164 m
restaurant: Monkey Sushi168 m
parking lot168 m
parking lot168 m
retail: Red Canoe169 m
retail172 m
transit stop: High Park Avenue174 m
transit stop: Pacific Avenue175 m
parking lot175 m
transit stop: Quebec Avenue176 m
cafe: Claudia's Cafe180 m
retail: Hunny Pot181 m
rail: Galt Subdivision181 m
retail: BEAU182 m
restaurant: Dundas Pizza182 m
transit stop: Pacific Avenue184 m
retail185 m
rail185 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

Overall vitality
67th
Edge activation
39th
Connectivity
53th
Amenity diversity
93th
Natural comfort
34th
Enclosure
84th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Ritchie Avenue ParketteUrban Plaza41
Raccoon ParkUrban Plaza41
Livingstone ParkUrban Plaza40
Oakdale ParkNeighbourhood Park40
Varsity Centre & ArenaAthletic / Recreation Park31

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Mclevin Woods ParkRavine / Naturalized Park49
ALEX WILSON COMMUNITY GARDEN - Open Green SpaceUrban Plaza59
Arnell PlazaCivic Square50
Trca Lands ( 26)Ravine / Naturalized Park27
Toronto Islands - Muggs Island ParkRavine / Naturalized Park25

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Vine Avenue Playgroundmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
Add or open more entrances and improve sidewalk continuity around the park. More permeability means more spontaneous use.
Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.
Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

real Toronto data

City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
Parks & Recreation Facilities
Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
Toronto Pedestrian Network
Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
Toronto Centreline V2
Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
Toronto 3D Massing
Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
Toronto Treed Area
Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
Toronto Street Tree Inventory
Tree count + density inside park polygons.
Neighbourhood Profiles
(Pending) Equity context proxy.
OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.