Corridor / Linear Parkcluster ·Active-edged · exposed parksRouge (131)confidence moderatereal Toronto data

City Wide Open Space

Corridor / Linear Park, middle of the pack overall (score 37, rank ~63th percentile). Strongest: edge activation; weakest: amenity diversity.

Aerial — City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

City Wide Open Space scores 37 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: amenity diversity (0). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors — not a definitive judgment.

Best for:walking + cycling routeslinear social use

Area · 0.25 ha

Vitality Score

37/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 61%

Data Confidence

37.0 / 100

Citywide

63rd

of all 3,273 parks

Among Corridor / Linear Park

67th

same primary typology

Expected for similar parks

median in small Corridor / Linear Park (n=76)

Performance gap

raw − expected · context confidence high

typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Explain this score

Where did the 37 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON

What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score

Amenity Diversity0 · p10

-10.0

Edge Activation17 · p75

-8.3

Border Vacuum Risk0 (risk)

+5.0

Enclosure / Eyes on Park59 · p29

+0.9

Natural Comfort44 · p47

-0.8

Connectivity51 · p57

+0.3

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

City Wide Open Space works because its edge activation score (17) is above average.

What limits this park

City Wide Open Space is held back by amenity diversity (0, bottom quartile).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally low amenity diversity (0, bottom quartile).

Jacobs reading

City Wide Open Space sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat — moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Typology classification

confidence 75%

Corridor / Linear Park

Classified as Corridor / Linear Park: shape elongation 3.2× a circle of equal area

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%

17.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 2 active uses (transit_stop) and 1 dead/hostile uses (rail). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%

51.3 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 0 mapped paths/walkways and 12 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 6 street intersections within 100 m; 11 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~581 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy — no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m6

Intersections within 100 m6

Paths/walkways (50 m)0

Sidewalk segments (50 m)12

Transit stops (400 m)11

Estimated entrances0

Edge connections / 100 m perimeter1.03

Park perimeter581 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightinferred 30%

0.0 / 100

No amenities recorded — score is 0 until inventory is loaded.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightpartial 60%

44.4 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 5.3% estimated tree canopy; nearest waterbody ~93 m. Reading: water-cooled. Source coverage: treed_area, waterbodies. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage5.3%

Canopy area0.01 ha

Inside ravine system0.0%

Water surface inside park0.0%

Nearest water (if outside park)93 m

Estimated green100.0%

City-mapped trees inside polygon0

Tree density0.0 / ha

Cover diversity (Shannon, 0–100)29.7

Sample points used19

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%

58.7 / 100

25 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (0 mid-rise, 25 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 6.9 m (~2 floors); 4.3 buildings per 100 m of 581 m perimeter — strong frontage density; edges are low-rise (mostly 2–3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 0 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m25

Buildings within 50 m25

Avg edge height6.9 m (~2 floors)

Tallest edge building8.2 m

Mid-rise (3–7 floors)0

Low-rise (< 3 floors)25

Towers (≥ 13 floors)0

Frontage density4.31 per 100 m perimeter

Mid-rise share of edge0%

Tower share of edge0%

Blank-edge share (proxy)0%

Park perimeter581 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%

0.0 risk

Park edges face the city — no significant border vacuum detected.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%

50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence — read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (0)

No amenities recorded for this park.

Nearby active-edge features (7)

transit stop — Stotts Terrace3 m
transit stop — Stotts Terrace18 m
rail — Kingston Subdivision99 m
rail — Kingston Subdivision103 m
transit stop — Rouge Hill153 m
transit stop — Rouge Hill GO Station Loop155 m
transit stop — Rouge Hill GO Station Loop189 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

Overall vitality
63th
Edge activation
75th
Connectivity
57th
Amenity diversity
10th
Natural comfort
47th
Enclosure
29th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Scarborough Hydro Green SpaceNeighbourhood Park37
Staines Road Retention PondWaterfront Park36
St. Philip'S Anglican Church CemeteryNeighbourhood Park36
Etobicoke Hydro Green SpaceCorridor / Linear Park36
Jane St - St Clair AveParkette37

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space — useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Kew GardensNeighbourhood Park71
Leslie Grove ParkParkette68
Market Lane ParkUrban Plaza63
ALEX WILSON COMMUNITY GARDEN - Open Green SpaceUrban Plaza59
Bellevue Square ParkCivic Square66

Human activity signals — not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of City Wide Open Spacematters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter — and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions — a starting point, not a prescription.

Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
Diversify what people can do in the park — playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden — even small additions raise this score.
Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.

Data sources

City of Toronto Open Data — Parks (Green Space)
Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
Parks & Recreation Facilities
Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
Toronto Pedestrian Network
Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
Toronto Centreline V2
Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
Toronto 3D Massing
Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
Toronto Treed Area
Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
Toronto Street Tree Inventory
Tree count + density inside park polygons.
Neighbourhood Profiles
(Pending) Equity context proxy.
OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.