Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Back to map
Civic SquareType:Underperforming / Leftover Space (waterfront-leaning)St Lawrence-East Bayfront-The Islands

The Park at CIBC Square

Civic Square, near the bottom of the city overall (score 20, rank ~4th percentile). Strongest: amenity diversity; weakest: natural comfort.

No photograph yet. If you have one of The Park at CIBC Square, we would like to use it.

Submit a photo

Data updated

The Park at CIBC Square scores 20.3 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: edge activation (0). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (100). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best forpublic eventsdowntown gathering

Area · 0.55 ha

What's here

Facilities
BenchesPublic art

Getting around

Paths

17 m of mapped path. Too little surface tagging to say how much is paved.

1 flight of steps on the mapped network.

Seating

No seating mapped in OpenStreetMap.

Arrival

No parking mapped in or within 200 m of this park.

Path, seating and parking data comes from OpenStreetMap and reflects what volunteers have mapped, not a survey. Absence here means nobody has recorded it. This section does not assess wheelchair access: the relevant OpenStreetMap tag is present on well under 1% of Toronto paths.

Vitality Score
20/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 62%

Data Confidence
20.3 / 100

Data confidence: moderate

Citywide
4th
of all 3,753 parks
Among Civic Square
1st
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
44
median in small Civic Square (n=29)
Performance gap
-24
raw − expected · context confidence medium
strong underperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map.

Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Public art in this park

Numbers match the pins on the map. Works near the park are within 30 m of its edge.

Explain this score

Where did the 20 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation0 · p62
-12.5
Amenity Diversity24 · p76
-5.3
Border Vacuum Risk100 (risk)
-5.0
Natural Comfort25 · p10
-3.7
Connectivity36 · p36
-2.7
Enclosure / Eyes on Park46 · p10
-0.4

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

The Park at CIBC Square works because its amenity diversity score (24) is above average and its edge activation (0) is also above-average.

What limits this park

The Park at CIBC Square is held back by natural comfort (25, bottom quartile): only 0% canopy means little summer shade; border-vacuum risk is also elevated (100).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally low natural comfort (25, bottom quartile).

Jacobs reading

The Park at CIBC Square is currently underperforming on both axes: neither integrated into the city nor offering deep natural respite. A candidate for design intervention.

Tradeoffs

  • 9 nearby towers cast wind and shadow without contributing canopy: passive surveillance is plentiful but human-scale comfort is not.

Performance in context

  • Strong underperformer relative to its cohort: raw 20 vs an expected 44 (gap -24).

Typology classification

confidence 90%
Civic Square

Classified as Civic Square: name flags as civic square + 15 buildings frame the edge

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
0.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 30 active uses (transit_stop, restaurant, retail, cafe) and 45 dead/hostile uses (highway, rail). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OpenStreetMap: cafes, restaurants, shops, schools, community centres, transit, parking, highways, rail. All data sources.

Connectivity

20% weightpartial 65%
36.4 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 0 mapped paths/walkways and 0 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 6 street intersections within 100 m; 4 subway or GO stations, 7 streetcar or LRT stops, 13 bus stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~455 m of perimeter. moderate edge density, small superblock penalty applied. Source coverage: centreline, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m3
Intersections within 100 m6
Paths/walkways (50 m)0
Sidewalk segments (50 m)0
Transit stops (400 m)24 (4 subway/GO, 7 streetcar/LRT, 13 bus)
Estimated entrances0
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter0.66
Park perimeter455 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops. All data sources.

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
23.5 / 100

2 distinct amenity types in the park (art, bench). Diversity drives the score, so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use. 1 public artwork in the park adds a bonus for the number of works.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags. All data sources.

Natural Comfort

15% weightinferred 30%
25.2 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 0.0% estimated tree canopy; nearest waterbody ~437 m. Reading: exposed. Source coverage: waterbodies. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage0.0%
Canopy area0.00 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)437 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon0
Tree density0.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)0.0
Sample points used38

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory. All data sources.

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
45.6 / 100

15 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (6 mid-rise, 0 low-rise, 9 tower); avg edge height 89.2 m (~30 floors); 3.3 buildings per 100 m of 455 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges dominated by towers; 9 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 6 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m15
Buildings within 50 m15
Avg edge height89.2 m (~30 floors)
Tallest edge building237.8 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)6
Low-rise (< 3 floors)0
Towers (≥ 13 floors)9
Frontage density3.29 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge40%
Tower share of edge60%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter455 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights). All data sources.

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
100.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor, Union Station Rail Corridor. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: OpenStreetMap: highways, rail, parking. All data sources.

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Not loaded yet: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles. All data sources.

Amenities (2 types · 2 records)

  • art
  • bench

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor0 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor4 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor4 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor4 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor4 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor5 m
  • retail: GO Transit Tickets7 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor23 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor24 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor31 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor32 m
  • restaurant: Druxy's Famous Deli33 m
  • cafe: Second Cup35 m
  • transit stop: Front Street West36 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor39 m
  • transit stop: Union Station40 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor44 m
  • restaurant: Aloette Go45 m
  • transit stop: Front Street West47 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor48 m
  • transit stop: Union Station57 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor61 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor64 m
  • rail65 m
  • transit stop: Bay West Teamway Entrance66 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor68 m
  • retail: Sephora72 m
  • highway: Yonge Street73 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor75 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor77 m
  • retail: Fika Cannabis78 m
  • transit stop: Front St Southeast stairs78 m
  • highway: Yonge Street79 m
  • retail: Lids81 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor81 m
  • highway: Yonge Street82 m
  • transit stop: Bay Street83 m
  • transit stop: Entrance from Brookfield Place (via PATH)83 m
  • retail: Uniqlo84 m
  • retail: LCBO86 m
  • cafe: Tim Hortons87 m
  • highway: Yonge Street87 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor89 m
  • rail: Union Station Rail Corridor89 m
  • highway: Yonge Street91 m
  • restaurant: Chotto Matte92 m
  • retail: Nespresso93 m
  • restaurant: Bagel Stop93 m
  • retail: Jo’s Shoe Repair94 m
  • transit stop: Bay Street95 m
  • transit stop: Yonge Street96 m
  • retail: Nails Station Nails & Spa97 m
  • transit stop: Front Street West97 m
  • restaurant: Shake Shack97 m
  • cafe: % Arabica98 m
  • cafe: The Brick Room Coffee98 m
  • transit stop: Entrance from Toronto Union Station98 m
  • retail: Gateway Newstands101 m
  • retail: Best Buy Express104 m
  • restaurant: Chotto104 m
  • highway: Yonge Street108 m
  • highway: Yonge Street110 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureThe Park at CIBC Square
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    4th
  • Edge activation
    62th
  • Connectivity
    36th
  • Amenity diversity
    76th
  • Natural comfort
    10th
  • Enclosure
    10th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of The Park at CIBC Square matters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Add or open more entrances and improve sidewalk continuity around the park. More permeability means more spontaneous use.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
  • Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.
  • Encourage mid-rise, windowed frontages around the park so residents have direct sightlines onto it.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Green Spaces
    Polygon boundaries, official names, land classes. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.