Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Back to map
Parkettecluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (enclosure-leaning)Niagara (82)confidence moderate

Shaw Park

Parkette, one of the city's strongest overall (score 69, rank ~100th percentile). Strongest: edge activation; weakest: connectivity.

Shaw Park scores 69 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and edge activation. Weakest: amenity diversity (33.4). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best fora quiet siteveryday neighbourhood use

Area · 0.67 ha

What's here

Recreation
Garden
Facilities
ShelterBenchesPublic art
Vitality Score
69/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 72%

Data Confidence
69.0 / 100
Citywide
100th
of all 3,788 parks
Among Parkette
100th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
37
median in small Parkette (n=247)
Performance gap
+32
raw − expected · context confidence high
strong overperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map.

Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Explain this score

Where did the 69 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation85 · p100
+8.9
Border Vacuum Risk0 (risk)
+5.0
Enclosure / Eyes on Park93 · p98
+4.3
Amenity Diversity33 · p87
-3.3
Connectivity61 · p79
+2.3
Natural Comfort63 · p80
+1.9

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Shaw Park works because its edge activation score (85) is one of the city's strongest and its enclosure (93) is also top decile (its perimeter is lined with active uses).

What limits this park

Shaw Park doesn't have a clear weakness. Every measured dimension is at or above the middle of the pack.

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high edge activation (85, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Shaw Park is a balanced hybrid: strong urban integration (80) and meaningful natural comfort (74). Rare in the Toronto Park Catalogue.

Performance in context

  • This park is a strong overperformer for its cohort: raw 69 versus an expected 37 for similar parks (small Parkette) (gap +32).

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Parkette

Classified as Parkette: small (6712 m²) with strong building frontage (21.6 per 100 m)

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
85.4 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 35 active uses (retail, restaurant, cafe, transit_stop) and 0 dead/hostile uses (none). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
61.3 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 0 mapped paths/walkways and 21 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 10 street intersections within 100 m; 24 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~324 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m10
Intersections within 100 m10
Paths/walkways (50 m)0
Sidewalk segments (50 m)21
Transit stops (400 m)24
Estimated entrances0
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter3.08
Park perimeter324 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
33.4 / 100

4 distinct amenity types in the park (art, bench, garden, shelter). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightmeasured 75%
62.8 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 27.7% estimated tree canopy; nearest waterbody ~1392 m. Reading: partially shaded. Source coverage: treed_area, waterbodies. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage27.7%
Canopy area0.19 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)1,392 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon0
Tree density0.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)85.1
Sample points used47

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
92.6 / 100

70 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (18 mid-rise, 52 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 9.5 m (~3 floors); 21.6 buildings per 100 m of 324 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are at a Jacobs-scale walkable mid-rise (3 to 7 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 18 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m70
Buildings within 50 m70
Avg edge height9.5 m (~3 floors)
Tallest edge building39.5 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)18
Low-rise (< 3 floors)52
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density21.59 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge26%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter324 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
0.0 risk

Park edges face the city. No significant border vacuum detected.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (4 types · 12 records)

  • art
  • bench
  • garden
  • shelter

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • transit stop: Shaw Street3 m
  • transit stop: Shaw Street11 m
  • transit stop: Queen Street West19 m
  • retail: Mofer Coffee20 m
  • retail: Sekai Nail and Beauty Bar25 m
  • retail: Foreign Rider Co25 m
  • retail: Hanji Gifts25 m
  • retail: Rainbow Collective25 m
  • retail: Sharpen26 m
  • restaurant: Ceniza26 m
  • retail26 m
  • retail27 m
  • restaurant: Prime Seafood Palace27 m
  • retail33 m
  • transit stop: Shaw Street35 m
  • restaurant: Chadon Beni37 m
  • retail: BYOB Cocktail Emporium37 m
  • retail: Ron's Cigar Store39 m
  • retail: Hong Phat41 m
  • restaurant: AMA44 m
  • retail: Show Gallery45 m
  • retail: Philistine48 m
  • retail: Paul Petro49 m
  • restaurant: Jules Bistro53 m
  • retail: The Citizen Room53 m
  • restaurant: Carmen58 m
  • cafe: Mercat del Carmen62 m
  • retail: 18 Waits73 m
  • retail: Blacksmith Cycle77 m
  • restaurant: Lipstick & Dynamite79 m
  • retail: KNIFE82 m
  • restaurant: Frankie's Diner84 m
  • restaurant: Montgomery's90 m
  • transit stop: Ossington Avenue92 m
  • restaurant: Jal Jood96 m
  • parking lot105 m
  • parking lot105 m
  • retail: Size?110 m
  • retail: Hobbiesville116 m
  • restaurant: Sweaty Betty's120 m
  • cafe: Jimmy's Coffee122 m
  • restaurant: Grill Dudes128 m
  • transit stop: Queen Street West132 m
  • restaurant: Le Swan133 m
  • retail: Convenience Canada136 m
  • transit stop: Adelaide Street West137 m
  • retail: Trinity Flower Cannabis138 m
  • retail: Parlour140 m
  • transit stop: Ossington Avenue141 m
  • retail: Fawn141 m
  • retail: Vape Palace142 m
  • retail: Tusk143 m
  • transit stop: Ossington Avenue144 m
  • retail: Gaspard146 m
  • transit stop: Adelaide Street West149 m
  • retail: Consign Toronto151 m
  • retail: Atomic153 m
  • retail: Stuart Jackson Gallery155 m
  • retail: Gravitypope155 m
  • retail: Aesop160 m
  • retail: Reigning Champ161 m
  • retail: Locks & Mane163 m
  • retail: Downtown Winery165 m
  • cafe: Tim Hortons167 m
  • parking lot167 m
  • parking lot169 m
  • retail: Le Labo169 m
  • retail: Ollie Quinn172 m
  • retail: Ratelier172 m
  • restaurant: Mother173 m
  • retail: Wine Rack173 m
  • retail: Ossington Self Storage176 m
  • retail: Carhartt WIP177 m
  • restaurant: Oyster Boy177 m
  • retail: Planet of Sound178 m
  • retail: AREA+001181 m
  • retail: Suzi Roher182 m
  • retail: Six Vapes183 m
  • retail: Cooney for Hair184 m
  • retail: Annie Aime184 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureShaw Park
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    100th
  • Edge activation
    100th
  • Connectivity
    79th
  • Amenity diversity
    87th
  • Natural comfort
    80th
  • Enclosure
    98th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Shaw Parkmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.