Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Manor Community Green, site photograph
Back to map
Urban Plazacluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (enclosure-leaning)Mount Pleasant East (99)confidence moderate

Manor Community Green

Urban Plaza, one of the city's strongest overall (score 64, rank ~100th percentile). Strongest: edge activation; weakest: connectivity.

Photo by Keven Menager via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026

Manor Community Green scores 64.1 / 100. Strongest dimensions: edge activation and enclosure / eyes on park. Weakest: amenity diversity (34.5). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best fordaily passing-throughpocket meetings

Area · 0.12 ha

What's here

Recreation
Sports fieldGarden
Facilities
Picnic areaBenches
Vitality Score
64/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 70%

Data Confidence
64.1 / 100
Citywide
100th
of all 3,788 parks
Among Urban Plaza
100th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
38
median in pocket Urban Plaza (n=360)
Performance gap
+26
raw − expected · context confidence high
strong overperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map. Connectivity, transit, and edge conditions read at a glance.
Manor Community Green, aerial top-down view
Top-down view.City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px. Reads the park’s footprint, paths, treed area, and edge conditions from above. City of Toronto Orthophoto · cot_ortho most-current MapServer · cached 5/9/2026.

Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Explain this score

Where did the 64 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation88 · p100
+9.5
Border Vacuum Risk0 (risk)
+5.0
Enclosure / Eyes on Park84 · p90
+3.4
Amenity Diversity35 · p89
-3.1
Connectivity46 · p51
-0.9
Natural Comfort51 · p67
+0.2

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Manor Community Green works because its edge activation score (88) is one of the city's strongest and its enclosure (84) is also top decile (its perimeter is lined with active uses).

What limits this park

Manor Community Green doesn't have a clear weakness. Every measured dimension is at or above the middle of the pack.

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high edge activation (88, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Manor Community Green is a balanced hybrid: strong urban integration (73) and meaningful natural comfort (66). Rare in the Toronto Park Catalogue.

Performance in context

  • This park is a strong overperformer for its cohort: raw 64 versus an expected 38 for similar parks (pocket Urban Plaza) (gap +26).

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Urban Plaza

Classified as Urban Plaza: 1248 m², paved (13% canopy), 48.0 buildings/100 m

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
88.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 44 active uses (transit_stop, cafe, retail, restaurant, community) and 0 dead/hostile uses (none). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
45.6 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 0 mapped paths/walkways and 11 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 4 street intersections within 100 m; 6 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~144 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m5
Intersections within 100 m4
Paths/walkways (50 m)0
Sidewalk segments (50 m)11
Transit stops (400 m)6
Estimated entrances0
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter3.48
Park perimeter144 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%
34.5 / 100

4 distinct amenity types in the park (bench, garden, picnic, sports_field). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightpartial 60%
51.3 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 13.3% estimated tree canopy; nearest waterbody ~1212 m; 1 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (1.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: treed_area, waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage13.3%
Canopy area0.02 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)1,212 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon1
Tree density1.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)56.7
Sample points used15

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
84.3 / 100

69 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (7 mid-rise, 62 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 7.2 m (~2 floors); 48.0 buildings per 100 m of 144 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are low-rise (mostly 2 to 3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 7 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m69
Buildings within 50 m69
Avg edge height7.2 m (~2 floors)
Tallest edge building22.3 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)7
Low-rise (< 3 floors)62
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density47.98 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge10%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter144 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
0.0 risk

Park edges face the city. No significant border vacuum detected.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (4 types · 12 records)

  • bench
  • garden
  • picnic
  • sports field

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • retail: Apricot Flowers26 m
  • retail: It’s Tea29 m
  • retail: Mastermind Toys29 m
  • restaurant: Positano Restaurant31 m
  • retail: Laura Stein Interiors31 m
  • retail: Penwarden Fine Jewellery32 m
  • restaurant: Phebe's Zee Grill33 m
  • retail: Wish List YYZ33 m
  • cafe: Thobors Café34 m
  • retail: New Manor Convenience35 m
  • restaurant: Yukashi36 m
  • restaurant: Chokka Persian Cuisine38 m
  • retail39 m
  • retail: Spa40 m
  • retail: Jules Cafe Patisserie42 m
  • transit stop: Manor Road East43 m
  • retail: Fogtown46 m
  • restaurant: Pizza Nova51 m
  • retail: Pro Locksmiths52 m
  • transit stop: Manor Road East58 m
  • retail: Maison Nurita58 m
  • community: Toronto Public Library - Mount Pleasant64 m
  • retail: Rosedale Kennedy Flowers66 m
  • retail: Snapdragon68 m
  • retail: Little White Sneakers69 m
  • cafe: Daphne’s Antioch Café Breakfast & Lunch70 m
  • retail: Piujut Gallery71 m
  • retail: B. T. Nail72 m
  • restaurant: XO Gelato74 m
  • retail: Inhabit Books76 m
  • retail: Alexandre Antique Prints, Maps & Books77 m
  • retail: Olive Oil Emporium79 m
  • retail: Kempik Fine Bulk Food80 m
  • retail: Unbox your Party80 m
  • retail: Toronto Bath Center82 m
  • community: The Toronto Camera Club84 m
  • retail: Pleasant Nails85 m
  • retail: The Manor Boutique Salon90 m
  • retail: Vanessa's Nails & Spa90 m
  • restaurant: Shibui Sushi93 m
  • retail: Periwinkle Flowers95 m
  • retail: Collected Joy96 m
  • restaurant: Domaine Mamo99 m
  • retail: Closets by Design100 m
  • retail: Cia Concept Store101 m
  • restaurant: Florentia Italian Ristorante104 m
  • retail: Foxies Bakeshop104 m
  • retail: Dove Depot Cleaners105 m
  • retail: White Rabbit Cannabis108 m
  • retail: Davisville Kitchens109 m
  • retail: Rewind110 m
  • retail: Caribou Gifts114 m
  • restaurant: Boland's Open Kitchen114 m
  • retail: Season Fruit House117 m
  • retail: Amoria Medspa Clinic120 m
  • retail: David Austin Hair121 m
  • retail: Night & Day Window Decor121 m
  • retail: Uberdog Mount Pleasant123 m
  • retail: Fine Custom Dry Cleaners125 m
  • retail: Elle Hair Studio125 m
  • retail: Candy's Costume Shop128 m
  • retail: Jacaranda Tree & Co.129 m
  • cafe: At Origin Cafe133 m
  • retail: Helene Clarkson138 m
  • retail: Green Natural Health and Nutrition Centre139 m
  • retail: The Massage Therapy Boutique143 m
  • retail: Royal Antiques Rug Gallery144 m
  • transit stop: Soudan Avenue145 m
  • retail: Flirty Flutters Lash & Brow145 m
  • retail: World of Repair Rugs148 m
  • retail: Frame Master156 m
  • cafe: Starbucks160 m
  • restaurant: Instant Du Palais161 m
  • retail: Livingstone & Co.163 m
  • retail: Elly Amar Studio166 m
  • retail: Dry Clean Alterations170 m
  • retail: Louis Shoe Repair171 m
  • retail: Durant Sessions172 m
  • restaurant: Pizza Pizza173 m
  • transit stop: Soudan Avenue178 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureManor Community Green
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    100th
  • Edge activation
    100th
  • Connectivity
    51th
  • Amenity diversity
    89th
  • Natural comfort
    67th
  • Enclosure
    90th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Visitor signals

Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.

Visitor signal score47 / 100
47.0 / 100

p60 citywide · p57 within Urban Plaza

Volume (saturated)4
Density / ha62
Rating contribution90
Match dampener×1.00
Average rating
★ 4.6
out of 5
Ratings collected
20
total reviews
Photos uploaded
10
total contributors

Source: Google Places API · match unverified (0.00 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Manor Community Greenmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Add or open more entrances and improve sidewalk continuity around the park. More permeability means more spontaneous use.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.