George Hislop Park
Urban Plaza, one of the city's strongest overall (score 52, rank ~95th percentile). Strongest: connectivity; weakest: natural comfort.
Photo by Ian Totman via Google Places · cached 5/9/2026
George Hislop Park scores 51.6 / 100. Strongest dimensions: connectivity and enclosure / eyes on park. Weakest: amenity diversity (27.3). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.
Area · 0.24 ha
What's here
Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 66%
Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.
Loading map…
The parks map is loading.
Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).
Explain this score
Where did the 52 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.
Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.
Why this park works
George Hislop Park works because its connectivity score (81) is one of the city's strongest and its edge activation (36) is also top decile (39 transit stops sit within a 400 m walk; 16 intersections fall within 100 m of the edge).
What limits this park
George Hislop Park is held back by natural comfort (38, below-average): only 0% canopy means little summer shade.
Most distinctive characteristic
Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high connectivity (81, top decile).
Jacobs reading
George Hislop Park sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.
Tradeoffs
- Connectivity (81) significantly outpaces natural comfort (38): well placed in the city but offers little shade or ecological respite.
- 32 nearby towers cast wind and shadow without contributing canopy: passive surveillance is plentiful but human-scale comfort is not.
Performance in context
- This park is a strong overperformer for its cohort: raw 52 versus an expected 38 for similar parks (pocket Urban Plaza) (gap +14).
Typology classification
Classified as Urban Plaza: 2407 m², paved (0% canopy), 42.3 buildings/100 m
Edge Activation
Within 100 m of the park edge: 65 active uses (retail, restaurant, transit_stop, cafe, community) and 7 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot, highway). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.
Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use
Connectivity
Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 15 mapped paths/walkways and 27 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 16 street intersections within 100 m; 39 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 9 estimated access points across ~272 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.
Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops
Amenity Diversity
3 distinct amenity types in the park (bench, drinking_water, garden). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.
Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags
Natural Comfort
Natural-comfort components for this park: ~5.6% effective canopy (0.0% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); nearest waterbody ~1360 m; 8 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (8.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).
Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory
Enclosure / Eyes on Park
115 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (59 mid-rise, 24 low-rise, 32 tower); avg edge height 35.8 m (~12 floors); 42.3 buildings per 100 m of 272 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges lean tall but still framed; 32 towers ≥ 40 m within 25 m of the edge. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 59 mid-rise edge buildings.
Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)
Border Vacuum Risk
Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot, parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.
Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints
Equity Context
Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.
Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles
Amenities (3 types · 10 records)
- bench
- drinking water
- garden
Nearby active-edge features (80)
- restaurant: Ehwa Restaurant4 m
- cafe: Treats7 m
- parking lot8 m
- restaurant: Constantine14 m
- restaurant: The Artful Dodger20 m
- restaurant: Tokyo Kitchen24 m
- retail: Rabba31 m
- retail: Solexotica34 m
- restaurant: Sang-Ji Fried Bao34 m
- parking lot42 m
- restaurant: The Nutition Bar42 m
- cafe: Zagmachi48 m
- retail: Anime Alley52 m
- retail: Longhairs53 m
- retail: Artist Alley Shop53 m
- restaurant: Da.si.mar Shawarma53 m
- restaurant: Twilight Cafe54 m
- retail: Bulk Mine54 m
- parking lot54 m
- cafe: Tim Hortons55 m
- retail: Popeye's Supplements55 m
- retail: 180 Smoke55 m
- restaurant: O Bong56 m
- community: The ArQuives56 m
- restaurant: Shinyi Dumplings57 m
- restaurant: Kothur Indian Cuisine57 m
- restaurant: Miss Fu in ChengDu57 m
- restaurant: Popeyes57 m
- restaurant: Xihe Peking Duck57 m
- retail: The Pet Store57 m
- restaurant: Toro Toro57 m
- restaurant: McDonald's59 m
- transit stop: Charles Street59 m
- parking lot: Isabella62 m
- retail: Bellair Tan63 m
- retail: Gadgets Plus66 m
- retail: Uomo Barbershop67 m
- restaurant: all@ne68 m
- retail: Rock Variety69 m
- restaurant: bb.q Chicken70 m
- highway: Yonge Street73 m
- restaurant: Naan Kabob74 m
- retail: Cosmetic World75 m
- retail: Elite Dry Cleaners75 m
- restaurant: Camros Organic Eatery75 m
- restaurant: Ginger Vietnamese Cuisine78 m
- transit stop: Charles Street80 m
- retail80 m
- highway: Yonge Street80 m
- retail81 m
- retail81 m
- retail81 m
- restaurant: Monga Fried Chicken82 m
- retail: Cheese Bakery82 m
- retail: Bez Bazaar82 m
- retail: Blue Shark Coffee84 m
- restaurant: The Salad House85 m
- retail85 m
- restaurant: The Diner's Corner86 m
- restaurant: Suski Biryani House86 m
- retail87 m
- restaurant: Hey I Am Yogost90 m
- retail91 m
- retail: H Mart91 m
- retail: Money Mart92 m
- cafe: Hero Tea93 m
- restaurant: Bingz95 m
- retail95 m
- highway: Yonge Street96 m
- restaurant: Pizzaiolo97 m
- retail: Nail's Attraction98 m
- restaurant: Pearl Yorkville Chinese Cuisine98 m
- restaurant: A BBQ House101 m
- transit stop: Hayden Street Entrance102 m
- retail: Dollarama103 m
- restaurant: Broken Rice103 m
- retail: ABC Books104 m
- retail: Game Centre Video Games106 m
- retail: Gogo Pets107 m
- retail: Outsource Computronic107 m
Park profile
Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.
Citywide percentile ranks
Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.
- Overall vitality95th
- Edge activation90th
- Connectivity99th
- Amenity diversity78th
- Natural comfort31th
- Enclosure81th
Most similar parks
Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.
- Robertson ParketteUrban Plaza48
- Bartlett ParketteUrban Plaza51
- Susan Tibaldi ParketteUrban Plaza46
- S.A.D.R.A. ParkCorridor / Linear Park56
- Bob Acton ParkNeighbourhood Park51
Most opposite parks
Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.
- Trca Lands ( 26)Ravine / Naturalized Park27
- Toronto Islands - Muggs Island ParkRavine / Naturalized Park25
- Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park26
- Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park28
- Rouge ParkWaterfront Park25
Visitor signals
Public attention measured by Google Places aggregates. This proxies attention, not occupancy. Aggregate-only: no usernames, no review text, no extra photos beyond the cached hero.
p17 citywide · p13 within Urban Plaza
Source: Google Places API · match high (0.96 composite confidence) · last refreshed 5/9/2026. Privacy contract. Measures public attention, not occupancy.
Human activity signals: not available
No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.
Does this score feel accurate?
Your read of George Hislop Parkmatters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.
Tell us how this park feels
We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.
What would improve this park?
Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.
- Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
- Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
- Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.
Data sources
- City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
- Parks & Recreation FacilitiesInventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
- Toronto Pedestrian NetworkSidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
- Toronto Centreline V2Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
- Toronto 3D MassingBuilding footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
- Toronto Treed AreaTree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
- Toronto Waterbodies & RiversWater surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
- Ravine & Natural Feature ProtectionRavine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
- Toronto Street Tree InventoryTree count + density inside park polygons.
- Neighbourhood Profiles(Pending) Equity context proxy.
- OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.