Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Santa Chiara Parkette, site photograph
Back to map
Urban Plazacluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (enclosure-leaning)Corso Italia-Davenport (92)confidence moderate

Santa Chiara Parkette

Urban Plaza, above average overall (score 41, rank ~75th percentile). Strongest: enclosure; weakest: amenity diversity.

Aerial, City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

Santa Chiara Parkette scores 40.8 / 100. Strongest dimensions: enclosure / eyes on park and connectivity. Weakest: amenity diversity (0). Border-vacuum risk is low. This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors, not a definitive judgment.

Best fordaily passing-throughpocket meetings

Area · 0.11 ha

Vitality Score
41/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 56%

Data Confidence
40.8 / 100
Citywide
75th
of all 3,788 parks
Among Urban Plaza
60th
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
38
median in pocket Urban Plaza (n=360)
Performance gap
+3
raw − expected · context confidence high
typical

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Loading map…

The parks map is loading.
Street context. Park polygon highlighted on the citywide map.

Boundary: OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Explain this score

Where did the 41 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Amenity Diversity0 · p30
-10.0
Edge Activation29 · p86
-5.3
Border Vacuum Risk12 (risk)
+3.8
Enclosure / Eyes on Park86 · p92
+3.6
Natural Comfort40 · p35
-1.5
Connectivity51 · p61
+0.2

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Santa Chiara Parkette works because its enclosure score (86) is in the top tier and its edge activation (29) is also top quartile (9 mid-rise buildings frame the edge with passive surveillance).

What limits this park

Santa Chiara Parkette is held back by amenity diversity (0, below-average).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high enclosure (86, top decile).

Jacobs reading

Santa Chiara Parkette sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat: moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Typology classification

confidence 70%
Urban Plaza

Classified as Urban Plaza: 1064 m², paved (0% canopy), 41.9 buildings/100 m

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
28.9 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 20 active uses (restaurant, retail, transit_stop, cafe) and 6 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
51.0 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 0 mapped paths/walkways and 7 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 12 street intersections within 100 m; 14 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 0 estimated access points across ~134 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy, no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m5
Intersections within 100 m12
Paths/walkways (50 m)0
Sidewalk segments (50 m)7
Transit stops (400 m)14
Estimated entrances0
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter3.75
Park perimeter134 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightinferred 30%
0.0 / 100

No amenities recorded. Score is 0 until inventory is loaded.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightinferred 24%
39.8 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: ~7.7% effective canopy (0.0% from contiguous tree polygons + scattered tree density); 11 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (11.0/ha). Reading: exposed. Source coverage: street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage0.0%
Canopy area0.00 ha
Inside ravine system0.0%
Water surface inside park0.0%
Nearest water (if outside park)1,500 m
Estimated green100.0%
City-mapped trees inside polygon11
Tree density11.0 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0 to 100)0.0
Sample points used15

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
86.2 / 100

56 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (9 mid-rise, 47 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 7.6 m (~3 floors); 41.9 buildings per 100 m of 134 m perimeter (strong frontage density); edges are low-rise (mostly 2 to 3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 9 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m56
Buildings within 50 m56
Avg edge height7.6 m (~3 floors)
Tallest edge building12.3 m
Mid-rise (3 to 7 floors)9
Low-rise (< 3 floors)47
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density41.95 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge16%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)0%
Park perimeter134 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
12.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" that suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence. Read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (0)

No amenities recorded for this park.

Nearby active-edge features (65)

  • parking lot7 m
  • transit stop: Northcliffe15 m
  • retail: Imperial Fruit Market21 m
  • restaurant: Cano31 m
  • restaurant: Subway37 m
  • retail: Chocosol37 m
  • restaurant: Royal Caribbean Cafe37 m
  • retail: Million Dollar47 m
  • retail: Jerrett Funeral Homes49 m
  • transit stop: Northcliffe52 m
  • retail: Money Mart61 m
  • restaurant: Limon65 m
  • parking lot65 m
  • retail: El Eden Ecuatoriano66 m
  • parking lot67 m
  • restaurant: True History70 m
  • parking lot70 m
  • retail: Delia Travel Agency71 m
  • retail: Palermo Bakery76 m
  • parking lot76 m
  • restaurant: Fox and Fiddle79 m
  • parking lot83 m
  • retail: Tattoohaus84 m
  • retail: Cash Max89 m
  • cafe: Wallace Espresso90 m
  • restaurant: Definitely Yours100 m
  • restaurant: El Tren Latino106 m
  • parking lot108 m
  • transit stop: Dufferin Street109 m
  • retail: Jolie Bridal110 m
  • parking lot114 m
  • cafe: Starving Artist114 m
  • restaurant: De Sotos114 m
  • restaurant: Pizzaiolo116 m
  • restaurant: Marcello's Pizzeria123 m
  • retail: Sun Sun Fruit Market124 m
  • retail124 m
  • retail133 m
  • restaurant: Popeyes135 m
  • transit stop: Glenholme139 m
  • restaurant: Vivid Bar & Lounge142 m
  • retail: 7-Eleven145 m
  • restaurant: L&T Bar Caffe145 m
  • retail: Salon 1065148 m
  • transit stop: Dufferin St at St. Clair Ave151 m
  • retail: St. Clair Textile151 m
  • retail154 m
  • transit stop: Dufferin St at St. Clair Ave157 m
  • retail158 m
  • restaurant: Osmow's164 m
  • retail: Coin Laundry Continental165 m
  • restaurant: Queenshead Sports Pub165 m
  • transit stop: Glenholme Avenue166 m
  • retail: Glenholme Variety171 m
  • restaurant: McDonald's171 m
  • cafe: Mofer Coffee172 m
  • restaurant: Church's Chicken175 m
  • retail: St. Clair Vape Shop Quik Mart177 m
  • retail: Video Games & Variety179 m
  • retail: St. Clair Photo Plus184 m
  • parking lot185 m
  • cafe: Tim Hortons191 m
  • restaurant: La Morena191 m
  • retail: Phil's Shoe Service196 m
  • transit stop: Dufferin Street198 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureSanta Chiara Parkette
Edge activation, connectivity, amenity diversity, natural comfort, and enclosure, each 0 to 100.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    75th
  • Edge activation
    86th
  • Connectivity
    61th
  • Amenity diversity
    30th
  • Natural comfort
    35th
  • Enclosure
    92th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space. Useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals: not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Santa Chiara Parkettematters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter, and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all, 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only, no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important
70%

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions: a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park (playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden): even small additions raise this score.
  • Increase canopy and reduce paved area. Shade and water features extend usable hours and seasons.

Data sources

real Toronto data
  • City of Toronto Open Data: Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types. Boundaries are reconciled against OpenStreetMap (ODbL) for new and updated parks.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.