Skip to content
Toronto Parks Atlas
Don Valley Golf Course — site photograph
Back to map
Waterfront Parkcluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (ravine-leaning)Lansing-Westgate (38)confidence moderatereal Toronto data

Don Valley Golf Course

Waterfront Park, below average overall (score 28, rank ~22th percentile). Strongest: natural comfort; weakest: enclosure.

Aerial — City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

Don Valley Golf Course scores 28.1 / 100. Strongest dimensions: natural comfort and connectivity. Weakest: amenity diversity (0). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (100). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors — not a definitive judgment.

Best for:waterfront recreationlong walks

Area · 74.86 ha

Vitality Score
28/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 63%

Data Confidence
28.1 / 100
Citywide
22nd
of all 3,273 parks
Among Waterfront Park
33rd
same primary typology
Expected for similar parks
35
median in very large Waterfront Park waterfront (n=44)
Performance gap
-6
raw − expected · context confidence high
modest underperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Explain this score

Where did the 28 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON
What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score
Edge Activation0 · p31
-12.5
Amenity Diversity0 · p39
-10.0
Border Vacuum Risk100 (risk)
-5.0
Natural Comfort71 · p85
+3.2
Connectivity63 · p79
+2.6
Enclosure / Eyes on Park48 · p11
-0.3

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Don Valley Golf Course works because its natural comfort score (71) is above average and its connectivity (63) is also top quartile (it sits inside the ravine system; water is part of the park).

What limits this park

Don Valley Golf Course is held back by enclosure (48, bottom quartile); border-vacuum risk is also elevated (100).

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally low enclosure (48, bottom quartile).

Jacobs reading

Don Valley Golf Course is currently underperforming on both axes — neither integrated into the city nor offering deep natural respite. A candidate for design intervention.

Tradeoffs

  • High connectivity coexists with high border-vacuum risk (100) — much of that connectivity is to highways, rail, or parking lots, not to neighbourhoods.

Performance in context

  • Reads as a modest underperformer relative to comparable parks (gap -6; cohort: very large Waterfront Park waterfront).

Typology classification

confidence 85%
Waterfront Parkalso reads as Ravine / Naturalized Park

Classified as Waterfront Park: 7% water surface inside park. Secondary read: Ravine / Naturalized Park (100% ravine overlap, 29% canopy).

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%
0.0 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 22 active uses (transit_stop, restaurant, cafe, retail) and 39 dead/hostile uses (highway, parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%
63.2 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 21 mapped paths/walkways and 46 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 12 street intersections within 100 m; 40 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 7 estimated access points across ~7,146 m of perimeter. low edge density — significant superblock penalty applied. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m5
Intersections within 100 m12
Paths/walkways (50 m)21
Sidewalk segments (50 m)46
Transit stops (400 m)40
Estimated entrances7
Edge connections / 100 m perimeter0.07
Park perimeter7,146 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightinferred 30%
0.0 / 100

No amenities recorded — score is 0 until inventory is loaded.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightmeasured 75%
71.3 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 28.8% estimated tree canopy; 100.0% inside the ravine system; 6.8% water surface; 47 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (0.6/ha). Reading: ravine-cooled. Source coverage: treed_area, ravine, waterbodies, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage28.8%
Canopy area21.52 ha
Inside ravine system100.0%
Water surface inside park6.8%
Nearest water (if outside park)0 m (inside)
Estimated green93.2%
City-mapped trees inside polygon47
Tree density0.6 / ha
Cover diversity (Shannon, 0–100)64.0
Sample points used800

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%
47.5 / 100

122 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (14 mid-rise, 108 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 6.8 m (~2 floors); 1.7 buildings per 100 m of 7,146 m perimeter — moderate frontage density; edges are low-rise (mostly 2–3 floors); no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 14 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m122
Buildings within 50 m122
Avg edge height6.8 m (~2 floors)
Tallest edge building22.9 m
Mid-rise (3–7 floors)14
Low-rise (< 3 floors)108
Towers (≥ 13 floors)0
Frontage density1.71 per 100 m perimeter
Mid-rise share of edge12%
Tower share of edge0%
Blank-edge share (proxy)43%
Park perimeter7,146 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%
100.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: Highway 401 Collector, Highway 401 Express, Highway 401 Express, Highway 401 Collector, Highway 401 Express, Highway 401 Collector, Highway 401 Collector, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, parking_lot, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, parking_lot, Yonge Street, Yonge Street, Yonge Street. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" — they suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%
50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence — read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (0)

No amenities recorded for this park.

Nearby active-edge features (80)

  • highway — Highway 401 Express0 m
  • highway — Highway 401 Express0 m
  • highway — Highway 401 Collector0 m
  • parking lot0 m
  • parking lot0 m
  • highway — Highway 401 Collector1 m
  • highway — Yonge Street14 m
  • highway — Yonge Street18 m
  • highway — Yonge Street19 m
  • highway — Highway 401 Collector23 m
  • highway — Yonge Street23 m
  • highway — Yonge Street25 m
  • transit stop — William Carson Crescent26 m
  • highway — Yonge Street34 m
  • highway — Yonge Street36 m
  • highway — Yonge Street38 m
  • highway — Highway 401 Express41 m
  • highway — Yonge Street42 m
  • highway — Highway 401 Collector42 m
  • cafe — Tim Hortons42 m
  • highway — Yonge Street46 m
  • highway — Yonge Street47 m
  • parking lot54 m
  • parking lot60 m
  • restaurant — Subway63 m
  • highway — Yonge Street64 m
  • parking lot64 m
  • transit stop — Yonge / Wilson Northwest Entrance65 m
  • parking lot65 m
  • transit stop — Yonge Street at Lord Seaton Road65 m
  • restaurant — Auberge du Pommier Restaurant66 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Road67 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Station68 m
  • transit stop — Yonge St at Wilson Ave71 m
  • restaurant — Swiss Chalet71 m
  • retail — Gateway Newsstands/Public Mobile72 m
  • transit stop73 m
  • highway — Yonge Street73 m
  • transit stop — William Carson Crescent77 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Station82 m
  • highway — Yonge Street83 m
  • highway — Highway 401 Collector83 m
  • transit stop84 m
  • highway — Yonge Street84 m
  • parking lot85 m
  • transit stop — 4025 Yonge Entrance86 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Station86 m
  • highway — Yonge Street86 m
  • parking lot86 m
  • parking lot88 m
  • highway — Yonge Street89 m
  • highway — Highway 401 Collector90 m
  • transit stop — Yonge Street90 m
  • highway — Highway 401 Collector91 m
  • parking lot92 m
  • parking lot93 m
  • parking lot95 m
  • transit stop95 m
  • cafe — Tim Hortons96 m
  • cafe — Starbucks97 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Station98 m
  • highway — Yonge Street101 m
  • highway — Highway 401 Express102 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Station102 m
  • parking lot105 m
  • transit stop — Yonge Street at Lord Seaton Road107 m
  • highway — Yonge Street108 m
  • highway — Yonge Street110 m
  • parking lot110 m
  • transit stop — Yonge Street112 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Station114 m
  • restaurant — Druxys116 m
  • restaurant — Chicken Quarter116 m
  • highway — Highway 401 Express118 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Station119 m
  • restaurant — Bento box122 m
  • parking lot124 m
  • transit stop — York Mills Station128 m
  • restaurant — Mr Souvlaki129 m
  • highway — Yonge Street131 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Edge ActivationConnectivityAmenity DiversityNatural ComfortEnclosureDon Valley Golf Course

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

  • Overall vitality
    22th
  • Edge activation
    31th
  • Connectivity
    79th
  • Amenity diversity
    39th
  • Natural comfort
    85th
  • Enclosure
    11th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space — useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

Human activity signals — not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Don Valley Golf Coursematters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter — and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

Rate this park on as many dimensions as you have an opinion about. 1 = not at all · 5 = strongly. Skip the ones you don't feel sure about. Aggregated only — no comments stored at the row level.

feels socially active
feels comfortable
feels safe
feels connected
feels welcoming
feels ecological / natural
feels good for lingering
feels family-friendly
feels culturally important

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions — a starting point, not a prescription.

  • Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
  • Diversify what people can do in the park — playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden — even small additions raise this score.
  • Encourage mid-rise, windowed frontages around the park so residents have direct sightlines onto it.
  • Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

  • City of Toronto Open Data — Parks (Green Space)
    Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
  • Parks & Recreation Facilities
    Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
  • Toronto Pedestrian Network
    Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
  • Toronto Centreline V2
    Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
  • Toronto 3D Massing
    Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
  • Toronto Treed Area
    Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
  • Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
    Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
  • Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
    Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
  • Toronto Street Tree Inventory
    Tree count + density inside park polygons.
  • Neighbourhood Profiles
    (Pending) Equity context proxy.
  • OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
    Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.