Parkettecluster ·Walkable Mid-Rise Neighbourhood Parks (ravine-leaning)Yorkdale-Glen Park (31)confidence moderatereal Toronto data

Hillmount Parkette

Parkette, above average overall (score 43, rank ~84th percentile). Strongest: edge activation; weakest: enclosure.

Aerial — City of Toronto orthophoto, ~8 cm/px source · cached 5/9/2026

Hillmount Parkette scores 42.7 / 100. Strongest dimensions: natural comfort and enclosure / eyes on park. Weakest: amenity diversity (11.9). Border-vacuum risk is elevated (36). This score is a transparent reading of Jane Jacobs-style vitality factors — not a definitive judgment.

Best for:a quiet siteveryday neighbourhood use

Area · 0.09 ha

Vitality Score

43/100

Weighted across six dimensions · confidence 68%

Data Confidence

42.7 / 100

Citywide

84th

of all 3,273 parks

Among Parkette

88th

same primary typology

Expected for similar parks

median in pocket Parkette (n=287)

Performance gap

+11

raw − expected · context confidence high

modest overperformer

Scores are not bell-curved. Percentiles and expected scores provide context without changing the underlying model.

Explain this score

Where did the 43 come from? Each weighted contribution against a neutral 50 baseline. Green = pushed up; red = pulled down.

Download JSON

What pushed this score up or down vs a neutral 50weight × score

Amenity Diversity12 · p75

-7.6

Edge Activation30 · p87

-5.0

Natural Comfort66 · p80

+2.4

Enclosure / Eyes on Park64 · p56

+1.4

Border Vacuum Risk36 (risk)

+1.4

Connectivity51 · p57

+0.2

Sum of contributions = the headline score. A negative bar means that dimension dragged the park below the city-wide neutral baseline.

Why this park works

Hillmount Parkette works because its edge activation score (30) is in the top tier and its natural comfort (66) is also top quartile.

What limits this park

Hillmount Parkette's edges are fronted by border-vacuum land uses (highways, rail, parking, blank institutional) — risk score 36.

Most distinctive characteristic

Most distinctive feature: exceptionally high edge activation (30, top quartile).

Jacobs reading

Hillmount Parkette sits between an urban social park and an ecological retreat — moderately useful for both, exceptionally suited to neither.

Performance in context

A modest overperformer for its parkette typology (+11 vs the median in pocket Parkette).

Typology classification

confidence 70%

Parkette

Classified as Parkette: small (892 m²) with strong building frontage (45.1 per 100 m)

Edge Activation

25% weightpartial 60%

29.8 / 100

Within 100 m of the park edge: 7 active uses (transit_stop, retail) and 3 dead/hostile uses (parking_lot). Active edges keep "eyes on the park" through the day; parking lots, blank institutional walls, rail and highway frontages drain street life.

Source: OSM POIs (amenity/shop) + Toronto Building Footprints + land use

Connectivity

20% weightmeasured 85%

51.0 / 100

Connectivity blends paths, intersections, transit, entrances, and edge density. This park has 1 mapped paths/walkways and 3 sidewalk segments within 50 m; 7 street intersections within 100 m; 14 transit stops within a 400 m walk; 1 estimated access points across ~122 m of perimeter. edge density is healthy — no superblock penalty. Source coverage: centreline, pedestrian_network, transit_osm.

Streets within 25 m3

Intersections within 100 m7

Paths/walkways (50 m)1

Sidewalk segments (50 m)3

Transit stops (400 m)14

Estimated entrances1

Edge connections / 100 m perimeter2.46

Park perimeter122 m

Source: Toronto Centreline V2 + Pedestrian Network + OSM transit stops

Amenity Diversity

20% weightmeasured 75%

11.9 / 100

1 distinct amenity types in the park (playground). Diversity, not raw count, drives the score so a park with many distinct activity types can outrank a larger park that repeats the same use.

Source: Toronto Parks & Recreation Facilities + OSM amenity tags

Natural Comfort

15% weightpartial 48%

65.8 / 100

Natural-comfort components for this park: 33.3% estimated tree canopy; 8 city-mapped trees inside the polygon (8.0/ha). Reading: partially shaded. Source coverage: treed_area, street_trees. Impervious surface is approximated (Toronto's authoritative layer ships only as a raster GeoTIFF).

Canopy coverage33.3%

Canopy area0.03 ha

Inside ravine system0.0%

Water surface inside park0.0%

Nearest water (if outside park)1,500 m

Estimated green100.0%

City-mapped trees inside polygon8

Tree density8.0 / ha

Cover diversity (Shannon, 0–100)91.8

Sample points used15

Source: Toronto Treed Area + Ravine + Waterbodies + Street Tree Inventory

Enclosure / Eyes on Park

10% weightmeasured 80%

64.3 / 100

55 buildings within 25 m of the park edge (0 mid-rise, 55 low-rise, 0 tower); avg edge height 5.2 m (~2 floors); 45.1 buildings per 100 m of 122 m perimeter — strong frontage density; edges are barely there or single-storey; no towers immediately adjacent. "Eyes on the park" come strongest from the 0 mid-rise edge buildings.

Buildings within 25 m55

Buildings within 50 m55

Avg edge height5.2 m (~2 floors)

Tallest edge building7.7 m

Mid-rise (3–7 floors)0

Low-rise (< 3 floors)55

Towers (≥ 13 floors)0

Frontage density45.10 per 100 m perimeter

Mid-rise share of edge0%

Tower share of edge0%

Blank-edge share (proxy)0%

Park perimeter122 m

Source: Toronto 3D Massing (building footprints + heights)

Border Vacuum Risk

10% weightpartial 60%

36.0 risk

Border-vacuum factors within 50 m of the park: parking_lot, parking_lot, parking_lot. Jacobs warned that highways, rail, parking lots and blank institutional edges act as "vacuums" — they suppress foot traffic and isolate the park from its neighbourhood.

Source: Toronto Street Centreline (highways) + rail layer + OSM landuse + building footprints

Equity Context

contextinferred 15%

50.0 / 100

Equity Context requires inputs not yet loaded for this park (Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles). Score is held at a neutral 50 with low confidence — read with caution.

Source: Toronto Neighbourhood Profiles

Amenities (1 types · 1 records)

playground

Nearby active-edge features (46)

parking lot15 m
parking lot21 m
parking lot48 m
retail — Rooney's Tire & Auto Centre49 m
retail — Cars Performance 160 m
retail — Yorkdale Certified Auto Service65 m
retail — Forest Hill Auto Body72 m
retail — The White Room91 m
retail — Terrain Flowers98 m
transit stop99 m
retail — The Style Bar102 m
parking lot106 m
retail — Active Green + Ross107 m
retail — V&D Cannabis109 m
transit stop — Glencairn Avenue110 m
restaurant — Darosa110 m
parking lot112 m
retail — IGO Optical115 m
retail — Loki Hair Studio117 m
retail — Flowers by Lucy118 m
parking lot118 m
transit stop — Glencairn Ave at Dufferin St119 m
restaurant — Beautiful City Restaurant120 m
parking lot121 m
restaurant — Esto Es Colombia122 m
retail — Standard Auto Glass122 m
retail — Enco Auto Trim124 m
retail — 2 Star Cleaners125 m
retail — Dufferin Laundry128 m
retail — Neighbours Coffee142 m
parking lot144 m
retail — The Fireplace Company146 m
transit stop — Glencairn Ave at Dufferin St148 m
parking lot154 m
cafe — Tony's Espresso Bar155 m
parking lot166 m
parking lot167 m
transit stop — Glencairn Avenue167 m
retail — The Meat Store171 m
parking lot174 m
retail — Market Balkan182 m
parking lot182 m
parking lot186 m
retail — Benjamin Moore193 m
retail — Quality Picture Frame195 m
retail — Ave 22 Off The Rack200 m

Park profile

Five-axis radar across the structural dimensions.

Citywide percentile ranks

Across all Toronto parks in the dataset.

Overall vitality
84th
Edge activation
87th
Connectivity
57th
Amenity diversity
75th
Natural comfort
80th
Enclosure
56th

Most similar parks

Closest in metric space across the five structural dimensions.

Chestnut Hills ParkParkette45
Ricardo ParketteParkette43
THISTLETOWN MULTI-SERVICE CENTRE - Building GroundsParkette41
Underhill ParkNeighbourhood Park42
Allanhurst ParkParkette43

Most opposite parks

Furthest in metric space — useful for recognising what kind of park this isn’t.

ALEX WILSON COMMUNITY GARDEN - Open Green SpaceUrban Plaza59
Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park18
Trca Lands ( 58)Waterfront Park18
Rouge ParkRavine / Naturalized Park21
Toronto Islands - Muggs Island ParkRavine / Naturalized Park25

Human activity signals — not available

No activity signals have landed for this park yet. The model has scored its physical form but it can’t yet say how often it’s programmed, photographed, or walked through. See /data-ethics for what we will and will not collect.

Does this score feel accurate?

Your read of Hillmount Parkettematters. We’re testing whether the model lines up with how people actually use the park. Submissions are stored locally; no account needed.

Tell us how this park feels

We measure structure (canopy, edges, connectivity). You measure feeling. Both matter — and disagreement is itself useful civic data.

What would improve this park?

Generated from the weakest measured dimensions — a starting point, not a prescription.

Activate the edges: encourage cafés, retail or community uses on the streets that face the park; replace blank or parking-lot edges where possible.
Diversify what people can do in the park — playground, washroom, water, shade, performance, sport, garden — even small additions raise this score.
Mitigate border vacuums (highways, rail, parking) with active programming on the still-permeable edges and treat the hostile edge as a design challenge.

Data sources

City of Toronto Open Data — Parks (Green Space)
Polygon boundaries, official names, types.
Parks & Recreation Facilities
Inventory of in-park amenities (washrooms, fields, rinks…).
Toronto Pedestrian Network
Sidewalk segments around and through parks; estimated park entrances.
Toronto Centreline V2
Street segments + intersection nodes near park edges; trails and walkways.
Toronto 3D Massing
Building footprints + heights for edge-building counts, frontage density, and tower-in-the-park risk.
Toronto Treed Area
Tree canopy share inside park polygons via stratified-grid sampling.
Toronto Waterbodies & Rivers
Water surface inside parks + nearest-water distance for cooling.
Ravine & Natural Feature Protection
Ravine overlap as a cooling / natural-comfort signal.
Toronto Street Tree Inventory
Tree count + density inside park polygons.
Neighbourhood Profiles
(Pending) Equity context proxy.
OpenStreetMap (Overpass API)
Cafés, restaurants, retail, transit stops, parking, highways, rail.